Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

biggest reason why we are 4 and 6


juliosantos

biggest reason why we are 4 and 6?  

125 members have voted

  1. 1. biggest reason why we are 4 and 6?



Recommended Posts

Injuries have played a very underrated role, particularly Oher. We were already weak at OT and Oher going down really stressed that weakness.

The coaches have done a poor job of in-game adjustments which is shown in our poor second half performances. Unfortunately, this is nothing new. Our coaches do abgood job prepping for games but they seem completely incapable of adjusting on the fly.

Gettleman did a poor job of addressing the weaknesses on the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Agreed. We are essentially, 3 plays away from a 7-3 record.

at Denver: Gano Field Goal

Buccaneers: D.A. pick in the endzone

Kansas City: Cam pick 6

i can't help but go back to the colts win last year; we really should've lost that game but we didn't. in fact, had the overtime rules still been the same as they were a few years ago before they were changed, we would've lost that game when they marched down the field and got their field goal first in overtime.

i'm not going to argue that the 2015 team wasn't better because they were; but they were also a lot luckier than we are now. last year we were also lucky against the saints in both games and the giants. unfortunately we don't have a perpetual horseshoe stuck up our ass like seattle has had since 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Agreed. We are essentially, 3 plays away from a 7-3 record.

at Denver: Gano Field Goal

Buccaneers: D.A. pick in the endzone

Kansas City: Cam pick 6

WE HAD THE LEAD AFTER CAM THREW THE PICK 6. WE HAD THE DAMN BALL WITH LESS THAN A MINUTE TO GO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Evil Hurney said:

Agreed. We are essentially, 3 plays away from a 7-3 record.

at Denver: Gano Field Goal

Buccaneers: D.A. pick in the endzone

Kansas City: Cam pick 6

Could be even better as well. First Aints game was winnable if not for a few plays like Gano's miss and their rookie kicker's 50+ yard winner. And Vikings game is probably a win if KB doesn't block in the back on that long Fozzy TD. That changed the whole game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...