Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I the only one who thinks an 8-8 finish should cost Rivera his job?


KillaCamNewton

Recommended Posts

You could also make the case that he brought a team that lost major contributors along as the season played out. 

If anyone needs to be gone it's Shula. His schemes are tired and predictable. Cam massively regressed this year and it's not solely on Shula I think it's multifaceted. But he carries the majority of the blame. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, top dawg said:

The Steelers have plenty of hardware. Part of the reason why is they are anything but a knee-jerk organization that fires head coaches for having a down year. They see the big picture, put a premium on coaching continuity, and as a result have arguably been the most successful franchise in the Super Bowl era. 

Sometimes in order to win the chip you remove the hump and get someone to lite a fire under the team bc of complacency .  Tampa Bay ..i loved tampa bay but when they let go dungy I was mad the next year they won the SB..Dungy was a great coach but he had done all he could do. Sometimes thats just how it is some coaches can assemble a great time but not coach them to win the big game..Dungy and Phil Jackson. of course dungy did win a SB but the team was already assembled as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm afraid Ron peaked in 2015

So many people just don't understand what a SB loss and/or win can do. It can easily go down the toilet right after, its happened many times. We held on to Fox too long. Ron should have a short leash especially considering he has bad judgement when it comes to his coordinators. I'll be surprised and glad if Ron stick to defense and let go of control over his offense and hire somebody better than Shula. The next offensive coach should have expertise in Quarterbacking too and if they want to remove Dorsey, then so be it. Dorsey I believe will be good in this league, he can do something else offensive.

If he doesn't show willingness to change, somebody has to make that change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprisingly, most of the media hasn't even mentioned Ron being on the hot seat at this juncture  Wouldn't read too much into it but there's definitely coaches who are in much more dire straights.

What does annoy me is all the people that want Ron fired and yet say nothing about who should replace him. If you're going to make that type of statement, at least provide a name. I'll even provide a list:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000753299/article/josh-mcdaniels-teryl-austin-top-coaching-candidates

I can only speak for myself but that list is a stinker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, outlaw4 said:

Surprisingly, most of the media hasn't even mentioned Ron being on the hot seat at this juncture  Wouldn't read too much into it but there's definitely coaches who are in much more dire straights.

What does annoy me is all the people that want Ron fired and yet say nothing about who should replace him. If you're going to make that type of statement, at least provide a name. I'll even provide a list:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000753299/article/josh-mcdaniels-teryl-austin-top-coaching-candidates

I can only speak for myself but that list is a stinker.

There's only 1 head coach currently in the NFL who fix everything wrong in Carolina. His record is almost the same every year, making him one of the most "consistent" coaches currently in the league. You want a name? I'll give you one.....

 

JEFF FISHER!

(Ducks as stones are thrown my way!!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

Surprisingly, most of the media hasn't even mentioned Ron being on the hot seat at this juncture  Wouldn't read too much into it but there's definitely coaches who are in much more dire straights.

What does annoy me is all the people that want Ron fired and yet say nothing about who should replace him. If you're going to make that type of statement, at least provide a name. I'll even provide a list:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000753299/article/josh-mcdaniels-teryl-austin-top-coaching-candidates

I can only speak for myself but that list is a stinker.

I don't get into it because I know this franchise. It would be a waste of time. I think a new OC has a higher chance of coming here. If so, I'll take Cooter all day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, outlaw4 said:

Surprisingly, most of the media hasn't even mentioned Ron being on the hot seat at this juncture  Wouldn't read too much into it but there's definitely coaches who are in much more dire straights.

What does annoy me is all the people that want Ron fired and yet say nothing about who should replace him. If you're going to make that type of statement, at least provide a name. I'll even provide a list:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000753299/article/josh-mcdaniels-teryl-austin-top-coaching-candidates

I can only speak for myself but that list is a stinker.

There are three potential head coaches I know of who have a prior connection to Dave Gettleman.

Frank Reich - they were together in Buffalo; Reich also has a connection to the Panthers as our first QB

Kyle Shanahan - connected via Shanahan's dad Mike, who was with Gettleman in Denver; arguably the hottest of the hot candidates right now

Anthony Lynn - was a player in Denver when Gettleman worked as a scout; getting a lot of attention for offensive improvement in Buffalo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Randolph Panther said:

Its crazy but Rivera's win/loss total almost reflects what Fox did in his first six years here.  Fox was 56-47 (counting playoffs) while Rivera would be almost the same if he wins one more. 56-45-1

We don't make the comparisons for nothing. Thats why most people ready to move on from DC's as our HC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denver got rid of Fox after he took them to the Super Bowl.  They realized he just couldn't push them far enough.  Rivera is just like Fox, or at least in a LOT of ways.  I worry it's the same here.   Richardson may just hire another guy like that though.

I don't think Rivera is gone, I kind of want it though.   I hope Shula at least is gone.  We need an offensive minded coach to get the most out of Cam.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...