Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those interested, we are in the 11th spot now


top dawg

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Catufb85 said:

And its going to continue to lower as I am not one for playing for draft picks.  Losing for draft picks is a loser's mentality and a losing franchise does that.  We have changed the culture of our organization.  We are out for blood and we are out to win games one to destroy playoff dreams for others and also to carry momentum into next season.  Players are playing for their jobs, future contracts, pride, and also we are playing 2 division rivals to finish the season.

Play to win the game!

What is really a loser's mentality is for this team to wait until we are out of the playoffs, then want to show up for work and win games.  Had they shown up all season long, we wouldn't be having this conversation.  You want to talk about guys playing for their jobs, these guys NEED to be gone next year.  Shoot, its because of these "wins" that might allow Gettleshorts to think we don't need to improve the team in free agency, and once again go after garbage bin players.  This team drives me up the wall to no end.  We can't win in the beginning of the year, and we can't lose at the end.  An utter disappointment this is, and don't get me started on the failure that is Kelvin Benjamin this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Kinda hope we do.  I want another stud on this team, and I damn sure don't trust Gettlemen to find him unless he's in the Top 10.  

I'd rather lose to the bucs than see some cocky failcon fans with their heads in their bottoms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Boxhead85 said:

Still don't understand how the Redskins have to tie one of the remaining two games though if we win out. 8-8=.500; 7-8-1=.469.

They tie, they get a 7-8-2 record, or basically an 8-8. Vikings, Redskins, and Panthers tie. Head 2 Head isn't considered since Redskins never played the Vikings. So Panthers would have the better conference record at 7-5 and get in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely believe our draft pick needs to be as close to the top ten as possible.  Gettleman has proven to be more loose with his thinking when we have late round picks.  He's wasted a pick with Shaq Thompson, and I'm starting to think KB is a wasted pick.  He's also tempted to trade up and waste picks if we are too far back. (Ex: Devin Funchess, Daryl Worley)  So if we are 11th now, I sincerely hope we don't lose more ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Matthias said:

What is really a loser's mentality is for this team to wait until we are out of the playoffs, then want to show up for work and win games.  Had they shown up all season long, we wouldn't be having this conversation.  You want to talk about guys playing for their jobs, these guys NEED to be gone next year.  Shoot, its because of these "wins" that might allow Gettleshorts to think we don't need to improve the team in free agency, and once again go after garbage bin players.  This team drives me up the wall to no end.  We can't win in the beginning of the year, and we can't lose at the end.  An utter disappointment this is, and don't get me started on the failure that is Kelvin Benjamin this year.

I completely understand the frustration and agree with you on the driving up the wall comment. We can sit here and say "IF" all day.  If we would have made those kicks we wouldn't be 6-8 but 9-4, and if we didn't have 10 guys in concussion protocol or if Luke didn't miss the last 4 games.   All of those loses have been more credited to poor coaching and poor execution on a play or two that unfortunately has been the case for the season.  Just 1 missed play here or there. That's football.  in 2015 we were 6-1 with games decided by 7 points or less, This year we are 2-4.  Those 4 games we were leading in 4th with opportunity to put games way.  I lean more towards the conservative playcalling than the players just weren't "playing hard."

With injuries, bad luck, coaching, playcalling, etc. whatever you want to call it.  We are where we are and only thing to do is keep playing hard and win ball games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Matthias said:

What is really a loser's mentality is for this team to wait until we are out of the playoffs, then want to show up for work and win games.  Had they shown up all season long, we wouldn't be having this conversation.  You want to talk about guys playing for their jobs, these guys NEED to be gone next year.  Shoot, its because of these "wins" that might allow Gettleshorts to think we don't need to improve the team in free agency, and once again go after garbage bin players.  This team drives me up the wall to no end.  We can't win in the beginning of the year, and we can't lose at the end.  An utter disappointment this is, and don't get me started on the failure that is Kelvin Benjamin this year.

I disagree a little - while these games are probably meaningless toward us making the playoffs, I'd much rather root for a team that shows some pride rather than one that quits.  Guys were playing hard last night.  Redskins had something like 20 yards rushing while we had 150ish.  That's how you can tell who is playing hard.

We don't need to pick in the top ten to get a top ten talent.  In 2014, Donald, Fuller, Shazier and Z Martin went 13-16.  There are good football players and potential starters throughout the first 3 rounds.  We just need to nail them, then hope they don't get injured.

Also, does everyone consider re-signing/extending Short, Star, Norwell, Turner, Addison, etc. to be "free-agency activity"?  Keeping these guys will not be cheap.  There may not be much left for a lot of splash signings if we want these guys on our team too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Matthias said:

I definitely believe our draft pick needs to be as close to the top ten as possible.  Gettleman has proven to be more loose with his thinking when we have late round picks.  He's wasted a pick with Shaq Thompson, and I'm starting to think KB is a wasted pick.  He's also tempted to trade up and waste picks if we are too far back. (Ex: Devin Funchess, Daryl Worley)  So if we are 11th now, I sincerely hope we don't lose more ground.

Here is a Panther fan rooting guide in weeks 16 and 17 to win the last two and STILL pick 11.  Not all of these games are relevant of course.  But the key games include Buffalo and Indy winning out, the Vikings, Redskins, and Packers all going 1-1 exactly as shown and believe it or not the Cowboys winning out to ensure the Bucs have a stronger SOS.

 

 

IMG_0583.PNG

IMG_0584.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Yeh, we actually need the Skins to lose one of their remaining games and TIE one... 

Well for 1 we'd have to win out. 2 Bucs and GB has to lose their last two. Vikings has to beat GB and lose to Chicago. Saints has to beats Bucs and lose to Atlanta and what you said but the odds are still better than hitting the lottery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hammerin'Cameron1 said:

But Star was like 14th overall .. Short was a second rounder, Philly Brown and Norwell were both UDFA .. Benwikere before he got hurt was a good pick and found in the 5th .. stfu, you don't trust him outside of the top 10 give me a break you idiot

Oh, this game?  We can play that.  Kony Ealy was a 2nd round pick.  Kelvin Benjamin is meh first round pick.  Shaq Thompson was picked over Landon Collins.  Devin Funchess was a 2nd round pick he traded for.  Good try though, you fuging clown.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...