Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2017 Offseason Outlook (cap space, draft picks,etc)


panther4life

Recommended Posts

All salary cap, free agent info, etc can be found here: http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/cap/2017/

CURRENT ESTIMATED CAP SPACE: 62.7 Millon minus 7.7 Million rookie pool = 55 Million after draft class is signed.

Pending Unrestricted Free Agents, age:

  1. Kawann Short (27)
  2. Charles Johnsn(30)
  3. Tedd Ginn Jr.(31)
  4. Mario Addison(29)
  5. A.J Klein(25)
  6. Colin Jones(29)
  7. Lenoard Johnson(26)
  8. Mike Remmers(27)
  9. Michael Griffin(31)
  10. Chris Scott(29)
  11. Kyle Love(30)
  12. Teddy Willams(28)
  13. Ben Jacobs(28)
  14. Ryan Wendell(30)

Restricted Free Agents

  1. Norwell
  2. Philly Brown
  3. Horton
  4. Whittaker
  5. Bersin
  6. Young

We have 16 players counting 2 million or more against the cap. In order

  1. Cam-       $20.1
  2. Luke-       $12.7
  3. Olsen       $10.3
  4. Kalil          $8.3
  5. Stewart    $8.25
  6. Davis       $8.25
  7. Lotulelei  $6.75
  8. Oher       $5.5
  9. Gano      $3.8
  10. Coleman $3.65
  11. Solalai    $3.5
  12. Lee        $3.5
  13. Dickson $2.7
  14. Benjamin $2.4
  15. Thompson $2.4
  16. Anderson  $2.2

Depending how much cap space we deem we need, some of these players could be asked to restructure or be cut outright to save more room/roster spaces.  Heres how much we could save by cutting each. Any dead cap hit could be spread over 2 years. 

Player,cap savings,dead cap

  1. Stewart, 4.75 million, leaving 3.5 in dead cap,
  2. Gano, 3.1 Million, leaving 750k in dead cap.
  3. Soliai, 2.5 Million,leaving 1 million in dead cap.
  4. Lee, 3.4 Million, leaving 0 in dead cap
  5. Dickson, 2 Million, leaving 600k in dead cap.

Numbers worth knowing 

2016 DT Franchise Tag, 13.6 Million. Don't have 2017's number yet but this should be close.

Charles Johnson's 2016 Cap hit, 2.6 Million. This should serve as a good reference point if he decides to come back.

Ted Ginn's last deal. 2 years 4.2 Million. Another good reference point if he is brought back.

36.7 Million. This would be our cap space if we resigned Johnson and Ginn to their previous deals, signed the rookie class and Franchised Short.  (This is before any cap savings moves are made via extensions, restructures or players being cut. 

2017 Draft Picks

We will have 8 total picks this year. We will retain our 1st-6th picks(barring trades), plus pick up a compensatory for Norman. We will get one of the Brown's 7th round choices and previously traded our own 7th this year to the Seahawks for Norwood.

2018 is the year we owe the Browns our 4th for Andy Lee.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, chknwing said:

with being so close to the 1st round with the 8th pick in the 2nd, I can see gettlemen moving up to say 31st or so to have 2 players with a 5th year option.

Sounds good and no doubt the Patriots would be game from 29-32, but I fear the price would be too steep due to the QB needy teams in front of us unless ALL of them (at least four) reach at the top of the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know some are probably going to disagree, but that 4th for Lee sticks out like a sore thumb in light of the way Palardy filled in.  It furthers my belief that overpaying (for) kickers is totally unnecessary. Yeah, it's crying over spilled milk, and kickers are very important to the team, but homework and due diligence leads to untapped value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, if we cut Lee we save 3.4 million? Hmm... Palardy has done well in Lee's absence. Sucks we gave up a 4th for Lee.

Soliai, Lee, and Dickson should be let go of as well. We're going to have some money to spend this year. Need to bring in some productive veterans to help with the incoming rookies, and younger players on the roster. Not doing that bit us in the bottom this past season, and was a major Gettleman fug up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the cap space we will have and roster upgrades needed, it looks like we should re-sign 

Johnson, Ginn, Addison, Norwell, Brown and Klein, if they all have reasonable demands.

I wouldn't be upset to go ahead and part way's with Gano as well.

Everybody else would be welcomed back, then can earn their roster spot by competing with the best we can bring in via the draft and free agency.

I have not looked at who is available, but I would like us to target veteran upgrades at Offensive tackle SS,DE, CB,and WR.

This time around, hopefully we can find veterans who aren't at the end of their career since we have more money to work with than in previous years.

Since we have such a low pick this year, I have already honed in on my favorite target and thats Leonard Fournette. I think he could come in immediately and being an instant impact player, while sharing carries with Stewart. 

I personally think Fournette could prove to be the best combination of talent available and player most ready to be a force immediately for us, above any other player or position that we may see sitting at pick # 8.  For our needs it would be nice to find the next Julius Peppers or Jordan Gross sitting there but that seems unlikely at this point from what Ive read. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

I know some are probably going to disagree, but that 4th for Lee sticks out like a sore thumb in light of the way Palardy filled in.  It furthers my belief that overpaying (for) kickers is totally unnecessary. Yeah, it's crying over spilled milk, and kickers are very important to the team, but homework and due diligence leads to untapped value.

It's a 4th for a pro bowl punter. Not only that but the Browns have to wait a whole year to get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gano has to be let go or restructure and come back with stiff competition at training camp. That number is absurd for the lack of production from him.  He directly cost us at least 3 games this season with his untimely misses.  He also missed a huge FG in the super bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kakarot said:

So, if we cut Lee we save 3.4 million? Hmm... Palardy has done well in Lee's absence. Sucks we gave up a 4th for Lee.

Soliai, Lee, and Dickson should be let go of as well. We're going to have some money to spend this year. Need to bring in some productive veterans to help with the incoming rookies, and younger players on the roster. Not doing that bit us in the bottom this past season, and was a major Gettleman fug up

Palardy earned a roster spot, somewhere.  Lee is still much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Snake said:

It's a 4th for a pro bowl punter. Not only that but the Browns have to wait a whole year to get it. 

OK, I may just be overreacting to a poo storm of a season, but seeing Lee gingerly walking around like he was just so lost---like he couldn't believe it, but knowing exactly what the fug was going on grated on my nerves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those saying let go of Lee are crazy, can't stress enough how a punter can give our defense great field positioning by an accurate punter.  Remember the times he put the ball inside the 10 multiple times?  If our defense can get back to shape of what they were in 2015, with him punting that will give us some very favorable field positions through-out the game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...