Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spotrac predicts KK contract


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Growl said:

I'm not sure what kind of existential commentary about sentiment you're trying to make here but I don't care either.

You obviously do because you have been berating Dave for choosing not to pay out the ass for players that are not worth thier over inflated asking price to this franchise.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Growl said:

Vernon Butler's presence in no way helps us retain Kawann Short. We may have another option should the worst occur but frankly that modus operandi has yet to yield any positive dividends for us, which, now that I think about it, will only embolden KK's side at the table even more. What it ultimately comes down to though is that Short doesn't care how the defensive tackle position looks without him. 

 

"I don't have to pay you that much, because i have Vernon butler"

"okay"

*signs with Atlanta*

*tensions boil over in locker room, team implodes, maybe literally"

That's another thing. I imagine losing KK would be a big blow to that locker room. Tag him or pay him, but if you tag him, the goal should try to get a long term deal done. We don't need to lose KK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm remiss to talk about "team chemistry" but that plays a very prominent role here as well.

There was a very clear divide between the locker room and the front office over Norman. Short knows that as well. Gettleman cannot let that happen again. If guys don't feel like there's any good faith in negotiations, if they feel like there's no commitment to winning (reinforced by how loss of Norman affected us last season) if they feel as if ownership isn't in their corner and is seemingly operating against them, that is poison.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

Vernon Butler's presence in no way helps us retain Kawann Short. We may have another option should the worst occur but frankly that modus operandi has yet to yield any positive dividends for us, which, now that I think about it, will only embolden KK's side at the table even more. What it ultimately comes down to though is that Short doesn't care how the defensive tackle position looks without him. 

 

"I don't have to pay you that much, because i have Vernon butler"

"okay"

*signs with Atlanta*

*tensions boil over in locker room, team implodes, maybe literally"

If Kk was the only DT on our roster,  would his agent not have more bargaining power? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, rodeo said:

After Norman players are going to know they can just refuse to sign the tag and then go anywhere they want for big money

Panthers weren't willing to over pay a CB that plays zone defense. 

Therefore,  Panthers won't pay the tag on a top talent at DT. 

Sorry, I don't buy that hyperbole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kakarot said:

That's another thing. I imagine losing KK would be a big blow to that locker room. Tag him or pay him, but if you tag him, the goal should try to get a long term deal done. We don't need to lose KK

No it won't.  These guys know it's a business.  And inorder for us to keep him he will have to come off that contract number just a bit or he is definitely walking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Bogart said:

And if that happens then we get a 3rd round comp pick and move on.  I would suggest that you not get emotionally attached to players.

I don't think that was his point.

If things don't work out with KK, so be it. But just as you say fans shouldn't be emotional, our FO should not be either. In regard that obviously we shouldn't panic and throw him record money like Hurney might have, but on the flip side we should act professionally, and not let negotiations get personal via simple ego.

He simply stated the obvious, our tactics with Norman whether you believe them to be right or wrong will have ripple effects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRed said:

I don't think that was his point.

If things don't work out with KK, so be it. But just as you say fans shouldn't be emotional, our FO should not be either. In regard that obviously we shouldn't panic and throw him record money like Hurney might have, but on the flip side we should act professionally, and not let negotiations get personal via simple ego.

He simply stated the obvious, our tactics with Norman whether you believe them to be right or wrong will have ripple effects.

His tactics?  What tactics?  The one where Norman's agent fuged up so bad  that he got fired for pissing off Dave?  And Norman went begging back to Dave to reconsider after he jerked him around for months refusing to sign because he was GOAT and will be paid accordingly?   Those tactics?  How dare he!

You guys need to get over that because neither you nor I know exactly what went down other than an agent fuged up for his client and got fired.  Josh got his money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea we can't keep losing these people but that is a bogus contract that I wouldn't pay. I'd try to get a good trade out of it.

1st and 3/4 would probably do it.

I mean really....ugh...if the cap goes up by like 5 mil or so I guess....just saw that it's supposed to go up like 10+ million wow...yea I'd do it on that thought but still would consider a trade depending on how much we can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RoaringRiot said:

When/where did GMan say he was using the Norman money on KK? I missed that quote.

I think was an assumption on the locals mind and thus it is so.   I don't recall him saying he was going to pay KK with that money, only that he was moving on from Josh and going to focus on other things like signing KK.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An odd little vibe I've noticed here of late: some folks are "all or nothing" to an absolutely extreme level when it comes to Bryce. There are, in fact, things Bryce does well. Likewise, there are areas in which he's improved over his time here. He has, on several occasions now, legitimately helped us win games. On the flipside, there have been failures in other areas as well as coaching that we're not in any way his fault.  And finally , it is also genuinely possible that the team may see him as the future, even if we don't. The craziest part, though? It's actually possible that they're right and we're wrong. All of this is true, and more, yet if you accept any of these premises people go from zero to apesh-t in under three seconds 😳 Anything less than total disavowal of Bryce and / or agreement that he's the worst QB of all time and suddenly you're a "stan". Oy 🙄 The reality though?  Bryce is indeed an NFL quarterback. Not a great one, probably backup level good, and I've seen way worse. Now, if you run that statement through your personal Google translator and it comes back with some version of "I want to throw 50 million a year at Bryce for the next 10 years", that's not really my issue it's yours  I don't wanna make him the franchise quarterback, but it's not my call. Win or lose, the team is going to do what they think is best. And as always, if it disagrees with what I think we should do, I'm gonna hope I'm the one who's wrong. Internet clout means nothing. Watching my favorite team win at my favorite sport meas fun 😁
    • I like Icky but he was the wrong tackle to take. Learning run blocking is much easier than learning pass blocking. Cross was pass pro ready. He was the tackle we should have taken without hesitation. 
    • Never saw this angle of the Tyson fight either lol.   
×
×
  • Create New...