Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What helps our team more?


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

Watching this Ala/Clemson game has me thinking about some different scenarios for the draft.

What improves us the most?

Cam Robinson instead of Oher

O.J. Howard instead of Dickson

Mike Williams instead of Funchess

Leonard Fournette instead of Stewart

Jamal Adams instead of Boston

Derek Barnett instead of Addison

John Ross instead of Ginn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, AU-panther said:

Who do you consider in play at 8?

I would like Hooker or Pepper at safety. Like an OT or RB in the second. Hard to predict once you go beyond the first round. You have to see who is left.

I suspect several of the guys you mentioned will be in play. What I said is I wouldn't pick them. But then again I am no professional scout so what do I know. I wouldn't have picked Butler or Shaq the last 2 years either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Baker just played how Baker played.... everywhere but here. He is a risk taking gunslinger.  Always has been.   Geno Smith was the best deep ball passer in the NFL his comeback season.  Wasn't even close that year.  Again, that's the type passer Canales has always been around in the offenses he has been part of.  The pass game that compliments the stubborn run is the deep chunk play pass game.   And that was his first investment with XL.  My continued point, is the same as going into last season.  It's a bad marriage going in.  The QB doesn't fit the scheme.  Again.  Carrol/Fox/Ron....all paired up their boring football with risk taking QBs.  And again, I'm fine if that is where we are going.  It's not my preference but that's not my argument.  I'm saying if we are doing that, we need a QB that matches it.     
    • I guess you missed the point. His rushing attack was dead last yet his team still performed. That’s not Fox/Rivera ball. His QB also had a career year. Remember the same QB that played for us in the same division and was so bad he was cut?  Carroll coached after Lynch as well. In fact Canales was more involved in the more recent offense with Geno Smith and a good rushing attack. People are taking him wanting a rushing attack and assuming that means we are shutting down our passing attack. Again many of the top offenses like SF, Miami, and Detroit featured strong rushing attacks. 
    • Too bad it was all for nothing because his dumbass goalie can't stay on his feet or control the puck when it's right infront of him 
×
×
  • Create New...