Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft: which scenario would you rather have?


Recommended Posts

SCENARIO A

1. Cleveland - Myles Garrett
2. San Francisco - Mitch Trubisky
3. Chicago - Deshaun Watson
4. Jacksonville - Dalvin Cook
5. Tennessee - Mike Williams
6. New York - Deshone Kizer
7. San Diego - Malik Hooker
8. Carolina - Jonathan Allen, Jamal Adams, Leonard Fournette, Derek Barnett, Jabrill Peppers

 

SCENARIO B

(A reach for QBs has the Cleveland Browns trading up for the number 8 pick ahead of Buffalo. The Browns make sure that Arizona didn't have a chance to make a move up and grab a QB before them.) 

based on PFT Draft Trade Chart value: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/draft/draft-trade-chart/

#8: 1440 points

#12: 1200 points

#52: 380 points 

Carolina receives: #12 and #52

Cleveland receives: # 8

1. Cleveland - Myles Garrett
2. San Francisco - Mitch Trubisky
3. Chicago - Jonathan Allen
4. Jacksonville - Leonard Fournette
5. Tennessee - Mike Williams
6. New York - Deshaun Watson 
7. San Diego - Jamal Adams
8. Cleveland (trade via Carolina) - Deshone Kizer
9. Cincinnati - Reuben Foster
10. Buffalo - Malik Hooker
11. New Orleans - Marlon Humphrey
12. Carolina (trade via Cleveland) - Derek Barnett
13. Arizona - 

40. Carolina - 
41. Carolina (trade via Cleveland)

 

 

#ThankYouDeshaunWatson#MajorShakeUpInDraft2017#ReachForQuarterbacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

B, because there's zero chance that Gettleman doesn't take Allen in scenario A.

Though, the epic Huddle meltdown would almost make it worth it.

But my god, we really don't need another 1st round DT 

I see in some places they have in listed at 260lb. Others at 290. Boy looks 290 to me. However, scouts are saying he can play anywhere on the line which I do agree with from watching a couple cut ups of him. He's a much better run stuffer than pass rusher. Seems more like a 43 DT and 34 DE. But would you play him at DE here? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...