Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Case for Curtis Samuel in the 2nd


Soul Rebel

Recommended Posts

Curtis Samuel 5'11'' 201 pounds (21 years old at start of season)

Here me out for a second....

RB is one of our needs and I know guys like Fournette, Cook, McCaffrey, Foreman, etc. are all tantalizing. If we are keen of extending J.Stew for say, another two years as the feature back, then why not get a complimentary back that fits the NFL's shift to hybrid players?  

Players like Danny Woodhead, Tyreke Hill, the duo in Atlanta of Freeman/Coleman, and what Ty Montgomery did in GB this year. 

If Fournette is off the board or if a player of better fit/need (Barnett, Allen, Adams) falls into our laps at 8, maybe Samuel makes sense in the 2nd.  

We need a slot WR that is a burner and can take the top off of a defense.  We also need a fresh set of legs at RB to give us a potent running game again. Well, this swiss army knife of a player, from a pedigreed school that we have already shown an undying love for has that exact player.  Depending on who's available at 40, and what we do in free agency, perhaps a player like Curtis Samuel makes a lot of sense for this offense. 

He's got explosive home run highlight hitter all over him. Was behind Zeke at OSU prior to this year, so his skills weren't really on full display until the latter part of '15 and all of this past season.  The jet sweeps, smoke routes and his fit between KB, Funch and Olsen would be incredible. 

We do have bigger needs, so this could be seen as a 'luxury pick', but it could also be seen as a BPA that adds more to Cam's arsenal. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

would much rather have other guys in the second

Edit:thats pretty vague, so specifically i would love to get LF i the first and then buddha baker in the second. If not baker, any OT or DE really. 

Im a fan of Baker as well but Ron has proved over the years he doesn't want a smaller sized safety. I have doubts that he is on our board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

Im a fan of Baker as well but Ron has proved over the years he doesn't want a smaller sized safety. I have doubts that he is on our board.

Good point. Could that change this year though? I feel like trends like this are formed on a prospect to prospect basic, i.e.: it is a trend and not a rule per say. I don't really keep up with this type of stuff though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dont want this kid

Too much of a project

He is going to have to be stricktly a WR in the NFL.  So learning routes trees, blocking etc

Kid has terrible hands.  And you guys worry abour Ginn, KB, and Funch.  Would be in a real suprise with him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a fan of his. He can create separation with his route running and also find open space in zone coverage.

I noticed how quick he hold the ball in his arm after the catch too. I guess he has good work ethic/attitude.

He could be a good quick pass target and safety valve on slot/RB position.

I'd rather have McCaffrey than him though. He won't be at 40.

We must improve the passing game using RBs as the threat.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
11 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

FWIW with all of the John Ross love and not wanting him at #8 ---

Samuel's early combine numbers....

4.31 40

37" Vert

18 Bench

R2 selection would be fine by me.

Those times were pretty good but he also showed one of reason I don't want him above the 3rd.  He had a hard rough time catching the ball.  The gauntlet drill looked rough.  Just way to raw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Those times were pretty good but he also showed one of reason I don't want him above the 3rd.  He had a hard rough time catching the ball.  The gauntlet drill looked rough.  Just way to raw

Went out for coffee and missed that. Hmm... would love to see that, but also sucks that he struggled with it. Was it just bad luck, or did he look uncomfortable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantastic athlete but way to big a project.  Never truely played WR more of a hybrid back.  Lineup in the back field either run the ball or motion to the slot.  Lack of knowledge of route running and route tree will be a setback.  Consistency at catching getting good a a solid hands catcher are all big hurdles.  

I think most want to compare him to Braxton Miller.  But Miller made the full on switch to WR.  Always lining outside running routes.  He picked it up easily and by draft time there was no big question.  Samuel is just a great big question mark. We don't know how he will pick it up. Heck there are some WRs who have played position there whole career and still struggle doing some of these things good enough to make the league.  4.3 is very impressive,  but this league is full of athletes that you need more than athletic ability to make it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...