Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This Year's WPMOY Award Is A Tie - One Person Didn't Make It

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted

NFL Network's Twitter Has Announced The Winners

Someone isn't included:

Sadly, Greg Olsen didn't make it.

Greg Olsen's foundation, Receptions for Research, focus' specifically on charitable work towards families whose children were struck with congenital heart disease and early screening, after his own son TJ suffered the disease and received great care at the Levine's Children Hospital. His son had to endure 4 open heart surgeries during the ordeal, and with early screening, he is a survivor.

His foundation has helped countless families with costs, love, and hope in North Carolina. 

So they make this a tie, and not include Greg Olsen? Are they serious right now? How is Greg Olsen not on here with his amazing work, especially with them rubbing it in with having a two way tie?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hoenheim Grand Master

Hoenheim

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, panther252 said:

fuging shameful. You pick one or give all three the award. Not make it two way tie and leave one man out of such a prestigious award and make it seem his contributions weren't as good as theirs. This is an insult to a Greg. 

yeah i think its stupid way of doing things too. especially when theres only 3 people there who could get the awards, naturally its going to be like a bitchslap to the 3rd person if the other two people win the award and he doesnt ...\

Could you imagine last year if D.Henry, C.McCaffrey, and D.Watson were the only ones invited to the Heisman ceremony.. Henry and McCaffrey are co winners and Watson just gets to sit there looking like a scrub? I mean the awards arent comparable but just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...