Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Desean Jackson or Pierre Garçon?


Nate Dogg

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SwagAces9030 said:

What do you mean "meh"? Jackson is an immediate upgrade over ginn.

Don't disagree with that. There are always free agents that are immediate upgrades over current/former players.

I mean I'd rather use whatever Garcon or Jackson would cost and upgrade at like 5 other positions, or toward KK, or toward Star, or toward Trai.

If they are cheap or the same price as Teddy, then sure. I am assuming they can be had at a premium, a difference I'd rather use elsewhere.  If Ted wants to play hard ball, kick him to the curb and get Stills, play Byrd, or draft someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

Don't disagree with that. There are always free agents that are immediate upgrades over current/former players.

I mean I'd rather use whatever Garcon or Jackson would cost and upgrade at like 5 other positions, or toward KK, or toward Star, or toward Trai.

If they are cheap or the same price as Teddy, then sure. I am assuming they can be had at a premium, a difference I'd rather use elsewhere.  If Ted wants to play hard ball, kick him to the curb and get Stills, play Byrd, or draft someone.

I don't know that Jackson will get the money everyone is thinking he will. I mean he's been misused now in Washington for what 3 years now? Obviously he will cost more than Ginn. I just don't think he will fetch as much as everyone thinks. Which could end up being a bargain for us because I feel he would put up Philly like numbers in our system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thefuzz said:

Jackson is going to break the bank somewhere.....looking at you San Fran.

He could, but don't you think the chances are small? He already got his yuge contract and he's older now. I'm not saying it will be team friendly, but surely it won't be that yuge right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

He could, but don't you think the chances are small? He already got his yuge contract and he's older now. I'm not saying it will be team friendly, but surely it won't be that yuge right? 

No, I fully expect him to get a pretty big deal.  If that isn't the case, I'm all for having him in the building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...