Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kevin Olsen charged with rape


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, dardarroarroar said:


What about the accused he will be continuously drug through the mud regardless of whether he did this or not and whether he's found guilty or not because of this mob mentality where we just assume guilt because opinions and emotions and the reason why we shouldn't do that is because if you are on the other end you really don't want people to assume you are guilty because being found guilty in public opinion is worse than being in the court of law because that will forever ruin you. And those type of pains in the ass don't go easy. And just because someone's a fug off or an asshole doesn't mean they are rapists they're not mutually exclusive but that doesn't mean that he did it because he's a dummy


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Just like Cam. The media likes to control the sheep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

And this is why women cry rape. No matter what you did people convict you.

And what is not sheep-ish about making it seem like women cry about rape with sort of regularity?  There is no reason to believe that other than because you are a sheep of what someone told you, seeing as there is no evidence in support of that belief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mage said:

And what is not sheep-ish about making it seem like women cry about rape with sort of regularity?  There is no reason to believe that other than because you are a sheep of what someone told you, seeing as there is no evidence in support of that belief.

Oh yea because everyone sides with the guy on rape charges. That's so sheepish lol. There is no evidence on either sides just accusations. Only thing we know is that they knew each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

Oh yea because everyone sides with the guy on rape charges. That's so sheepish lol. There is no evidence on either sides just accusations. Only thing we know is that they knew each other.

What does that have to do with what I asked?  You are acting as if women lie about rape with regularity.  That is a sheep-ish opinion.  There is no reason to think that.  The evidence I was referring to is evidence that supports women lying about rape more than any human does about any other crime, male or female, rape or robbery.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Issue really is no one knows the truth. Theoretically, women could easily construe any sexual act as perpetuated rape and fake it, especially if things do not go their way. But there are others who truly are guilty.

I've experienced seeing someone falsely accused of rape. He had proof of consent luckily, and he never got in trouble. Not too hard to see it happen in this case.

Nevertheless, she could also be a victim. We just don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mage said:

What does that have to do with what I asked?  You are acting as if women lie about rape with regularity.  That is a sheep-ish opinion.  There is no reason to think that.  The evidence I was referring to is evidence that supports women lying about rape more than any human does about any other crime, male or female, rape or robbery

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Someone correct me- doesn't Dave have a six year contract??? I think Dan Morgan does as well..... that's the price you have to pay once you get a rep for firing HCs....  
    • Brother re-check that guarantee...my page shows 30mill.....thats means he's staying in my book for at least til the end of 2026.  Im going to be my normal honest self, besides watching like half of the SB, I didn't know the guy. My guess is Panthers have a "planned model of paying players" and they almost had to spend a chunk of space on a DLman after Dbrown injury season gave them a nightmare out-come of worst D in NFL scoring. Once Milton got above Dbrown payments, they went with the plan B. A player whom the "co-GM" put his name with. Brad said turk would not be a problem off-field and leader, which the Panthers need badly. I dug in with the google-fu, I found out  I also found him playing lots of NT, which was shocking given the small frame. He seems ready for a bigger role and had a great SB too. IDK, I feel Dan Morgan was dead set on not going into this season without more DL depth and its there. The real deal is this, nearly all FA take one year to "adjust". I think turk is trying too hard and causing injuries as a result for his contract. Dbrown called turk "strong as hell" and I know for a fact Dbrowns has insane core and strength numbers. They lift together with the 50 LB difference...... you always lift with a guy who's similar in strength cause you can leave on the 8 wheels, let the other guy lift while you rest and go after him.  I do wish he had a better beginning to his panther career, 3 games for him to do so and it would cover up the low points if he made a few plays.... Again it felt like they almost had to make move/spend $$$ and Morgan was going to have DL depth this season no matter what...My best guess. 
×
×
  • Create New...