Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Ready To Shop At Tiffany's? Not So Fast.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So, David Newton actually posted something that's well worth noting. Many on here are under the conceived notion that we would have a lot of money to spend, but Newton doesn't believe so. When considering who we likely are going to focus on bringing back, it may not be as much of a huge FA grab as many here hope.

Rather, it looks to be another off-season focusing on keeping our key guys.

http://www.espn.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/24651/panthers-still-not-ready-to-shop-at-tiffanys-despite-more-than-50-million-in-cap-space

Quote

Fifty-plus million is a lot, particularly when you consider a few years ago the Panthers had about $16 million in cap space.

But when you consider what it's going to cost to sign a few of Carolina's own free agents to long-term deals, the number shrinks fast.

Let's start with defensive tackle Kawann Short. Should the Panthers go ahead and use the franchise tag while they continue to negotiate a long-term deal that will eat up an estimated $14,770,194 in cap space.

The checkbook already is down to $35 million to $37 million. It could be down more if the Panthers work out a deal that averages more than the tag price.

The Panthers also would like to sign defensive tackle Star Lotulelei to a long-term deal even though they picked up his fifth-year option for the 2017 season. Let's say he wants a deal among the top 12 tackles. That would eat up between $5 million to $6 million, maybe more.

So now you're down to around $29 million, give or take a few million.

Say the Panthers decide to keep defensive end Mario Addison, who led the team in sacks this past season with 9.5. That could cost $3 million to $6 million, depending what his market value is.

Toss in defensive end Charles Johnson at another one-year, $3 million bargain like last year and you're closing in on $20 million in available cap space.

Then there's tackle Mike Remmers. He moved from right to left tackle the final 13 games last season after Michael Oher was diagnosed with a concussion. He probably won't get left tackle money, at least from Carolina, but the 10th-ranked right tackle last year earned $5.5 million.

If Remmers gets that, now you're getting to the $15 million range available.

Wide receiver Ted Ginn Jr. also is a free agent. He counted $2.775 million against the cap last year. He likely will have a more cap friendly deal moving forward, but that still could cost $1.5 million or more.

Very daunting to say we may only have $10m left over to spend in FA, not to mention keeping some of that for our draft picks. I was thinking about researching and posting on this, but David already did that job for me, and it's very daunting.

We may truly have another lackluster offseason with the way keeping our own guys is looking out to be.

So, I wouldn't expect big-name players like Berry or JPP to be anywhere near Charlotte, but guys like LT Matt Kalil, CB Captain Munnerlyn, DE Julius Peppers and WR Victor Cruz are likely targets if they're on the cheap. I'm hoping Cyprien is also on the radar, but I don't know if we can afford him.

Very grateful Gettleman has achieved us to have this much cap to use to resign our guys, but does give a downer considering how much of our cap they'd eat up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is nice to think and dream of signing a ton of guys and getting the big catch, but we should all know by now we just don't do that. That's ok, just as long as we bring our guys back and grab solid role players. My la la land signing is DJax...probably won't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Lobo said:

It is nice to think and dream of signing a ton of guys and getting the big catch, but we should all know by now we just don't do that. That's ok, just as long as we bring our guys back and grab solid role players. My la la land signing is DJax...probably won't happen.

If we're closer to the $60m cap I originally believed we'd have, then I'd see some good signings with decent name players. But $50m? I don't think we'll go out and hunt down hard.

Oh, forgot we needed a FB as well. Well add that to the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the feeling that we're not keeping everyone. After all, we can always either find a cheaper alternative through the draft/FA or use the savings of losing one key player to grab two or three good ones and bolster other areas of the roster. It really depends on what direction we want this roster to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article doesn't take into account how we structure the money over the course of these contracts. Take Star for example. We might sign him long term but backload the deal or at least structure it so he doesn't get a ton of money this year. GMs have all kinds of ways to play with the cap.

Im not saying we won't use most of our cap room on our own guys, but I'm more optimistic than this article makes me feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Reebis21 said:

This article doesn't take into account how we structure the money over the course of these contracts. Take Star for example. We might sign him long term but backload the deal or at least structure it so he doesn't get a ton of money this year. GMs have all kinds of ways to play with the cap.

Im not saying we won't use most of our cap room on our own guys, but I'm more optimistic than this article makes me feel.

Very fair, but I don't know about backloading much. You consider the 2018 offseason will be another heavy one for us, so I don't know how much Gettleman wants to save for that headache as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

If we're closer to the $60m cap I originally believed we'd have, then I'd see some good signings with decent name players. But $50m? I don't think we'll go out and hunt down hard.

Oh, forgot we needed a FB as well. Well add that to the list.

Well if we cut Dickson and do a restructure with Stew or perhaps a cut and sign like CJ, we will be closer to 60. There's a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce Young has recorded 4 game-winning drives through nine weeks, leading the Carolina Panthers to crucial victories in tight contests. The 12-play, 58-yard clock-killer versus the Packers in Week 9 (16-13 upset). This pace positions him as the team's most clutch performer in years, with a 68.4% success rate on go-ahead drivesalready surpassing many franchise benchmarks early in his career.   Young's early 2025 surge (top-5 league-wide in clutch EPA at 0.28 per dropback) not only outstrips the debuts of Newton (2 in 2011) and Delhomme (1 in 2003) but hints at him climbing this list quickly if the Panthers sustain their wildcard hunt. Data underscores his growth: no other Panther QB hit 4 GWDs before Week 10 in a season.   The energy fans pour into the stadium directly shapes Bryce Young’s performance positive support has been shown to elevate his fourth-quarter efficiency by 12%, strengthening team cohesion and execution under pressure. Criticizing or booing the starting quarterback fractures morale, disrupts focus, and undermines the very resilience needed in clutch moments. When fans stand firmly behind their QB and team, they become a true home-field advantage, amplifying performance and accelerating the path to sustained success. Now are you a Carolina Panther fan or a Panther hater? 
    • Bryce would have extended some plays scrambling with his legs but then again he also has a high number of fumbles so you never know what you're going to get and the way the Bills were getting after Andy (sacked 7 times) it stands to reason Bryce would have been under duress often. What exactly do you want here? I mean I'm going to go by the gameplan I saw after Bryce turned the ball over against GB. Clearly Dave Canales was deliberately trying to limit the opportunities for him to make a catastrophic mistake. And didn't Micah Parsons log zero QB pressures? So with that in mind if you are asking for anyone to argue our offense with Bryce would have had much if any success against that opportunistic motivated Bills defense while we were also splitting carries between Rico and Chuba who had the majority of them which ended up being a situation resulting in a weeks worth of scathing criticism and deservedly so then I'm going to just have to say we can agree to disagree.
×
×
  • Create New...