Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Next Time A Falcon's Fan Tells You Cam's No Man...


Saca312

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not in my opinion. I work in the veterinary field. He can die in a fire.

If somebody grows up around people involved in dogfighting and sees it a lot and is never ever told that it's wrong how the hell is he supposed to learn that? Vick was financing it, and a little bit involved but is hardly what people make him out to be. He's done way more to help animals since getting out of prison than he did to hurt them in the first place. I hated him as a Falcon and hated what he did but the man served his time in prison and has done a ton of good since then, and clearly learned and changed as a result. Not sure what more you could ask of anybody in his situation. You working in the veterinary field is 100% irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

If somebody grows up around people involved in dogfighting and sees it a lot and is never ever told that it's wrong how the hell is he supposed to learn that? Vick was financing it, and a little bit involved but is hardly what people make him out to be. He's done way more to help animals since getting out of prison than he did to hurt them in the first place. I hated him as a Falcon and hated what he did but the man served his time in prison and has done a ton of good since then, and clearly learned and changed as a result. Not sure what more you could ask of anybody in his situation. You working in the veterinary field is 100% irrelevant.

If you can't see why someone who works in the veterinary field might possibly feel differently, then you might be socially retarded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If you can't see why someone who works in the veterinary field might possibly feel differently, then you might be socially retarded.

Of course I can see why they might feel differently, but they shouldn't, which is my point. One's profession should not be relevant at all to viewing a situation objectively. You clearly can't do that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Brownmike said:

That's cool, you stick with the QB who ran from a fumble with the SB on the line and just had the worst season of his pro career and who is inferior to Meg Ryan by any metric you want to use.

And trashing a rivals QB is silly when you do it and then turn right around and defend your team's inferior QB.

Newton running from the fumble shows who he is when the chips are down.  As did his pouting after the SB loss.  He was all smiles and taunts when winning....then he got his ass handed to him and suddenly he wants to pout.

Not a guy I'd want as my team's QB.

 

 

 

None of that makes sense.  You got anything else other than the fumble thing?  I mean, it's a good dig and all but cmon, anything else?  Like, at all?

i get the sense you want me to run pull stats and craft an argument while you prepare to just say fumble no matter what.

i think there is a term for that behavior.  Troll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Brownmike said:

 

I'm not trying to "win".  The fact is Cam quit with the SB on the line.  I simply stated a fact.

You're not stating a fact you're stating your opinion.

Fact: Cam did not dive for the ball

Opinion: Cam did not dive for the ball because he quit on his team, fans etc...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, thomas96 said:

Of course I can see why they might feel differently, but they shouldn't, which is my point. One's profession should not be relevant at all to viewing a situation objectively. You clearly can't do that. 

I can understand why you would feel he's served his sentence and deserves a second chance and I can respect that.

You can't. You say you can, but then immediately turn around and tell someone how they SHOULD feel. I was unaware that you were the moral authority of the universe. Your statements show a clear lack of understanding and empathy. Hence, my claim of your social retardation.

You can feel however you want and that's fine by me, to you should really check yourself before telling others how they should feel and how what they commit their life's work to is irrelevant in terms of their viewpoints on certain subjects. Pediatricians are likely to be more sensitive to children's issues. Climatologists are likely to be more sensitive on subjects relating to climate change. Those in vet field are likely to be more sensitive to issues relating to animals.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I can understand why you would feel he's served his sentence and deserves a second chance and I can respect that.

You can't. You say you can, but then immediately turn around and tell someone how they SHOULD feel. I was unaware that you were the moral authority of the universe. Your statements show a clear lack of understanding and empathy. Hence, my claim of your social retardation.

You can feel however you want and that's fine by me, to you should really check yourself before telling others how they should feel and how what they commit their life's work to is irrelevant in terms of their viewpoints on certain subjects. Pediatricians are likely to be more sensitive to children's issues. Climatologists are likely to be more sensitive on subjects relating to climate change. Those in vet field are likely to be more sensitive to issues relating to animals.

 

Never did I say your opinion is wrong or not moral, I was just expressing mine and asking questions to further understand your view. One's feelings are what they are, their profession doesn't define how they feel about things. You saying you're a veterinarian in this instance was a way for you to make it seem like your opinion on the matter was somehow more important than mine or others. I can tell you right now that I care as much about dogs as anyone. Just because I'm not in that field doesn't mean I don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Never did I say your opinion is wrong or not moral, I was just expressing mine and asking questions to further understand your view. One's feelings are what they are, their profession doesn't define how they feel about things. You saying you're a veterinarian in this instance was a way for you to make it seem like your opinion on the matter was somehow more important than mine or others. I can tell you right now that I care as much about dogs as anyone. Just because I'm not in that field doesn't mean I don't. 

Except by telling me how I should feel you inessense were telling me that I was wrong.

And no, my comment on my career was not to make my opinion seem as if it mattered more, it was to give some background as to why I feel the way I do.

If you don't think that one's career can help shape one's viewpoints, then I don't know what to tell you.

I will say that in my opinion you're just being stubborn here. I've sai that I understand and respect why you feel the way you do with no qualifiers. You claim the same, then proceed to continue to argue why I should feel differently and why my career path shouldn't have any impact on my viewpoints. That makes no sense to me and I don't know why you keep arguing it. If you truly respected the way I felt you'd just drop that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Except by telling me how I should feel you inessense were telling me that I was wrong.

And no, my comment on my career was not to make my opinion seem as if it mattered more, it was to give some background as to why I feel the way I do.

If you don't think that one's career can help shape one's viewpoints, then I don't know what to tell you.

I will say that in my opinion you're just being stubborn here. I've sai that I understand and respect why you feel the way you do with no qualifiers. You claim the same, then proceed to continue to argue why I should feel differently and why my career path shouldn't have any impact on my viewpoints. That makes no sense to me and I don't know why you keep arguing it. If you truly respected the way I felt you'd just drop that.

Think we're both getting caught up in a small thing here. People's viewpoints are shaped by everything in their life. I was just saying you can provide your viewpoint without saying what your profession is, because that's not relevant to me. Only the viewpoint. You saying you're a vet came across to me as you thinking your thoughts on Vick were somehow more important than others. I understand that wasn't your intention but can you not understand how it could come across that way to some?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2017 at 8:43 PM, MtnJax said:

Cam never murdered dogs or made them fight

 

On 2/23/2017 at 8:43 PM, MtnJax said:

Cam never murdered dogs or made them fight

 

On 2/23/2017 at 8:43 PM, MtnJax said:

Cam never murdered dogs or made them fight

Lay off Vick he off limits..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎2‎/‎25‎/‎2017 at 8:37 PM, Brownmike said:

 

When has Cam Newton been relevant outside of 2015?  He broke the rookie record on a terrible team then it was broke the very next season by Andrew Luck.

Hes had two winning seasons in his six seasons.  Only 3 playoff wins and one of those came against a Cardinals team that was down to their 4th string QB. The only reason the Panthers even made the playoffs that season is because their division was so terrible 7 wins won it.  Even still I think Cam only went 5-8-1 as a starter that year.

Ryan has been a better QB, it's not even debatable.

Guy, no matter what you say over here, it's all made irrelevant by one simple fact.......and I'm going to break it down for you real simple like, m'kay?

25 point lead BLOWN, within 1.5 quarters of football in the SB!!!

 

All of your arguments are invalid and pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...