Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF's Free Agency Preview: Carolina Panthers


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

What you need to know

Despite only moderate personnel movement in the offseason, the Panthers took a large step backward in 2016 from their previous season, when they reached the Super Bowl. Similarly to 2016, the Panthers are unlikely to be very active in free agency. At this stage the Panthers main goals should be to retain their own top free agents — which they have partly already done — and develop the young group of players they have on the team and complement this core through the draft.

Salary cap room

$36,548,761 (15th in NFL; as of 3/3/2017)

Biggest needs

  • Tackle
  • Edge defender
  • Running back
  • Cornerback

Notable free agents

  • Ted Ginn Jr., WR, 72.5 overall grade in 2016
  • Charles Johnson, Edge, 81.4

Must re-sign

Charles Johnson, Edge, 81.4 overall grade in 2016

The Panthers have already re-signed or tagged their most important free agents in Mario Addison and Kawann Short. The next in line is Johnson, who might not be the solution alone, but can still very much contribute on the defensive line. Although Johnson will be 31 by the time training camp starts, he was still Carolina’s best defensive lineman against the run outside of Short. In addition, he is still able to bring pressure as he recorded 4 sacks, 9 quarterback hits and 31 quarterback hurries in 2016.

Dream splash

Alshon Jeffery, WR, Chicago Bears, 77.6

It is nearly impossible for the Panthers to make a splash signing at a position of need as the free agent market lacks any superstar offensive tackles or edge rushers. Although wide receiver is not the biggest need, Jeffery could bring Carolina’s receiving corps – which at this point consists mainly of unproven young wide receivers – to a whole new level.

Top 2016 free agency prospects

Andrew Whitworth, T, Cincinnati Bengals, 91.3

One of the Panthers’ top priorities should be to provide protection to Cam Newton, as this has already cost them a Super Bowl and has not been addressed since. Even though Whitworth will turn 36 next season, he shows no signs of decline as he allowed only 14 total pressures all year, yet signing him should not be extremely expensive due to his age.

Eddie Lacy, HB, Green Bay Packers, 77.3

Jonathan Stewart turns 30 in March and he is not getting any younger. Furthermore, his yards per carry have gradually declined over the past two seasons. Although Lacy presents several question marks with his injury history and rollercoaster performance over his career, his potential could be worth the risk, especially since his history should influence his asking price.

Logan Ryan, CB, New England Patriots, 83.5

Although Carolina drafted multiple cornerbacks last year, they went through some growing pains after moving on from Josh Norman in 2016. The Panthers once again have a need at the cornerback position and while Ryan – coming off a Super Bowl victory – might not be a cheap option, he could provide much needed help both in the slot and on the perimeter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrible picks for targets, even our own CJ. If we sign someone like Jeffery or Whitworth, we won't have money for anyone else that will make a big enough impact. I doubt CJ is even going to be re-signed unless it is for way under what he could get elsewhere. I wouldn't pay him more than $3 mil a year, and someone else out there will probably give him twice that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bronn said:

Terrible picks for targets, even our own CJ. If we sign someone like Jeffery or Whitworth, we won't have money for anyone else that will make a big enough impact. I doubt CJ is even going to be re-signed unless it is for way under what he could get elsewhere. I wouldn't pay him more than $3 mil a year, and someone else out there will probably give him twice that.

No player would make a bigger impact than Whitworth. Who would we miss out on by signing him? Not many impact guys period

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

No player would make a bigger impact than Whitworth. Who would we miss out on by signing him? Not many impact guys period

For what it would cost to get Whitworth, you could sign 2 solid rotational pass-rushing DEs (even if CJ was one of them) and a Safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bronn said:

For what it would cost to get Whitworth, you could sign 2 solid rotational pass-rushing DEs (even if CJ was one of them) and a Safety.

  And who are these players? Why would we need 2 rotational DEs? We are almost certain to draft one. And what safety? Who are you going to sign that is going to make a bigger impact than going from awful to very good at LT? We have cap space to sign Whitworth and still address other areas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...