Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mega trade watch! 49'ers, Redskins and Cowboys


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

Apparently the Redskins are getting ready to make what I would say would be one of the dumbest trades in NFL history,  and considering the recent news in regards to the issues in the Redskins front office I can't say I'm surprised to hear they may try something like this .

 What does this  mean why is this panthers relevant?   This means we could see a huge shake up in the draft  because Kirt Cousins has been tagged the 49ers would have to give up two first round picks for him, would  also mean that the 49ers are looking at Fournette anymore 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Apparently the Redskins are getting ready to make what I would say would be one of the dumbest trades in NFL history,  and considering the recent news in regards to the issues in the Redskins front office I can't say I'm surprised to hear they may try something like this .

 What does this  mean why is this panthers relevant?   This means we could see a huge shake up in the draft  because Kirt Cousins has been tagged the 49ers would have to give up two first round picks for him, would  also mean that the 49ers are looking at Fournette anymore 

Crazy if it happens. A lot would change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Contacted by PFT's Mike Florio, "multiple sources with direct knowledge of the situation scoffed" at NFL Network's report/rumor of a three-way trade sending Tony Romo to Washington, Kirk Cousins to San Francisco, and other compensation to Dallas.

One source called the rumor "conjecture," and Florio says Ian Rapoport effectively "made up" the story. Rapoport also reported Friday that Julio Jones was having foot surgery on Monday, but he isn't. The Cowboys certainly would not want to send Romo to a division rival, and there is no reason for Dallas to be involved in any trade sending Cousins to the 49ers. Florio wrote that Rapoport "gets points for creativity and for filling a slow Friday afternoon with a little intrigue." Put simply, the three-way trade isn't happening and was so unrealistic it almost seemed concocted from an online message board.
 
 The SF-WASH part still has legs. Either way, someone who needs a QB would be picking at #2. Shouldn't change much. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

Can't wait to see the aftermath when we pass on Fournette for someone nobody is talking about. 

I want Fournette, but I also recognize that running back is nowhere near a big need on the team as the offensive line right now.

if we dont go Fournette I want us to double dip on the o-line this year. The only pick I'm fully against is the anything for the D-line.  If they want another defense event they should've drafted one last year instead of Butler Who I believe is a wasted pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Rapoport  is a legitimate source for NFL news,  and wouldn't be reporting it if there was nothing to it.

Florio is one of Rapoport's biggest rivals  so take that into consideration as well 

  Which scenario makes more sense? Seriously? Why would the Cowboys bail out a division team who just traded their QB and is almost guaranteed to regress, for a late round pick? Rappaport is a click-baiter and has been since his days as a beat writer for Bama. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...