Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IMHO!!


WOW!!

Recommended Posts

From what I'm seeing in the moves that have been made .. Here are a few opinions on future transactions...

1. Gman has conceeded that Fournette, Thomas and the 2 safeties are not going to be on the board at 8.. So he might be trading back to 11 - 15 to get either Ross, Howard or Barnett and a extra pick in the 2nd or 3rd round.. The Browns pick at 12 could be the target .. The Browns move up to get one of the young QB's or use the 8th pick to get Grapapplo from the Pat's.. While still getting Garrett at 1. ..

2. I see a combo of Safety and DE in the 1st 3 picks and a 3rd round RB... He brought these older guys in to easy the transition of younger players in a year ir 2..

3. Only RB he likes in the 1st is Fournette.. After that the only RB's i see he might be into are 3rd and 4th round avilable players..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

or I can see DG moving up to #5 to get either Fournette or Adams. 

He isn't moving up when he has said to many times "this draft is deep" and "you're never 1 player away".. He isn't going to trade away a chance to get atleast 4 future starters for 1..

He can walk out of this draft with a stater at WR and future starters at DE, TE, S, and RB..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you might want to get use to him not valuing RB's like you do...

Gman might be in the '"really not liking to spend a 1st round pick on a devalued position like RB" club.. He is all about value and he has that NY Giants philosphy .. They never draft 1st round RB's..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Some of you might want to get use to him not valuing RB's like you do...

Gman might be in the '"really not liking to spend a 1st round pick on a devalued position like RB" club.. He is all about value and he has that NY Giants philosphy .. They never draft 1st round RB's..

Never say never...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rodeo said:

Far more likely we package that pick we just got from NE to move up than it is we move down.

Source: Gettleman has never moved down, but moved up every draft.

I disagree.. He is looking to get his future DE, Safety and Weapon on offense in this draft.. You don't trade picks to get less picks in a draft you think is deep..

The other times he traded up the drafts weren't as deep and he didn't have so many picks in the top 100 before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam's game is entirely dependent on the RB being a threat so that they can't key on Cam as a runner OR a passer on every down. Stew is unreliable due to health and a struggling OL at times.

A talented RB that we can rely on for the next 5-8 years is just what we need and I think Gman knows that if he knows anything about the build of this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade back with Cleveland and get Barnett

Use the NE second rounder and Cleveland's second to move up and get Ross in the first

Use our second rounder to get Obi

Use the 3rd round comp pick to get the Iowa TE

Use the 4th rounder to get Perine

Use the 5th on a developmental LT like Davenport

Use the sixth and seventh for whatever.

Celebrate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XClown1986 said:

Maybe we set up a package of picks to go to 1 and get Myles Garrett

Really??

1st i don't think we have a package good enough to convince Cleveland not to take Garrett..

2nd We aren't one player away..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is a tough decision.  There is another factor.  Is he in game shape?  A tired Hunt is not better than an "in-shape" Corbett.  When coming off an injury, it is natural to want to protect the injured area, even if it is completely healed.  This can cause you to contort your body for no reason, lose fundamentals, and it could lead to other injuries.  For example, I had a knee in high school that required getting taped.  That made me aware of the knee (not used to tape on my knee) and I pulled my groin (favoring or dragging the leg with the tape).  The trainer explained the groin injury the way I do here--but scared money makes no money.  If he is cleared to play, he is cleared to play.  Watch him, rotate him in for a series, etc.  Specifically, I would want to watch the matchup--who is winning more--Corbett or Hunt?  How is the defense reacting (if at all) to Hunt being in?  Etc.  
    • Shannon was sued for $50 million (settled out of court, I believe) for forcing sex on his girlfriend during a two-year relationship.  He denies it, but ESPN let him go last April.  Chad Johnson's wife filed a police report because he head-butted her in a car and was put on probation. I had to google it.  I watched the Ray Rice video and when you see it, you realize just how vile and cowardly abusing a woman really is.  But for the same point Aussie tried to make, these women are defenseless, and being phyiscally bigger and stronger does not validate your actions.   I can't even stand to watch Steve Smith.  I can't normalize this kind of behavior--again, I do not think R-P had that in mind when he posted this.  When the reason was exposed, we should realize that we are talking life (quality of) and death (in some cases) here.  
    • I can respect the fact that we should not glorify or normalize men who have a history of beating women.  I do not think anyone was thinking of that when they posted this, but if head-butting your wife and unconsensual sex (rape) is something you cannot overlook, I agree with that.  I think they are both half-crazed attention hounds regardless of their pasts.  
×
×
  • Create New...