Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justice League


h0llywood

Recommended Posts

BvS was very close to being a pretty damn good movie, a lot of the hate that movie gets is undue criticism. SS on the other hand was just awful. 

Basically DC needs to stay afloat for two more movies: WW and Justice League. After that they will be free of Snyder's terrible decision making and Geoff Johns will be head of creative control. 

We just need Justice League to be decent. We kinda need WW to be a home run because comic book movies are sorely lacking a female lead. 

 

I'm a big fan of DC characters, and Green Lantern is my favorite so I'm just praying DC learned from its mistakes and won't repeat them again. 

Justice League already looks to have more humor than BvS which is a great sign. Still not a fan of Snyder's dark toned fetish but whatever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

People keep saying it's DC but the ones in control here is WB. DC can't do anything but nod in agreement or just see Batman movies get made for the next 20-30 years.

Johns isn't exactly who I'd hire to oversee the DCU. The guy has conceived some crappy concepts. I would have preferred Timm but I think he got himself blacklisted for something. 

Visually, this film will kick ass but I'm worried about the need to cater to those idiots who are in love with Marvel's cookie cutter formula. I haven't enjoyed an MCU film in quite awhile outside Dr Strange and Guardians of the Galaxy. 

I kinda like it. It looks very Watchmen-esque. 

would have rather had Timm as well 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2017 at 2:25 PM, Promethean Forerunner said:

We'll see but the DCU isn't a flop thus far. It's made almost two billion. Critically, it's a clusterfug but the hyperbole was extreme for BvS and SS.

Money wise, yes its been a success. As far as making a Home Run movie, not so much imo. 

BvS had its moments (mainly Batfleck and Wonder Woman) but just missed the mark for me. It felt like they tried to fit 5 lbs of crap into a 3lbs bucket. I could not get into to SS at all. Leto's joker was terrible and ruined it for me. 

I'm hoping Wonder Woman is good. The trailers look awesome. Justice League looks like it will be fun. Momoa's Aquaman was badass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it has potential. BvS was terrible. I will say the extended version was a better film but still not good. Suicide Squad was one of the worst films I've seen in a while. 

That said of course I will waste my money and go see this. I hope they bring back Batman's more cunning qualities in future films. I got the sense that in BvS he was a what you see is what you get type of guy. You don't get the feeling that he has something up his sleeve at all times. Which was something Nolan/Bale had, almost Bond-esque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

DC movies have got casting all wrong, for years, fycking years. Aquaman is the only thing they've done right since Micheal Keaton. Look at Marvel. They killed off Hugh Jackman to recast. That's bold. Needed but bold. There is no hope for DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
    • Yeah don't wanna see anyone get hurt.  Hopefully Chatters is sitting.
×
×
  • Create New...