Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte Observer mock top 8


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

What separates this mock draft is that The Observer asked other team's newspaper insiders for their opinion.

1. Cleveland Browns

The pick: Texas A&M DE Myles Garrett (Mary Kay Cabot, Cleveland Plain Dealer)

Browns’ needs: Edge rusher, quarterback, safety.

Insider knowledge: Cabot calls Garrett the best player who can make an immediate impact, “whereas the quarterbacks are going to take some time.” The Browns will continue to scout Mitch Trubisky, Deshaun Watson and DeShone Kizer, although Cabot believes Cleveland will be able to get one of those QBs when the Browns pick again at No. 12.

People’s choice: Given Cleveland’s dark quarterback history, Browns fans seem fine the idea of taking Garrett with the No. 1 overall pick.

2. San Francisco 49ers

The pick: Stanford DE Solomon Thomas (Eric Branch, San Francisco Chronicle)

49ers’ needs: Quarterback, wide receiver, edge rusher.

Insider knowledge: As much as first-year coach Kyle Shanahan would like to get rolling with a franchise QB, Branch expects Shanahan to use Brian Hoyer as a place-holder until 2018, when the Niners can go after Kirk Cousins or choose from a deeper QB group. In the meantime, Branch sees new GM John Lynch going defense in his first draft by taking an elite pass-rusher from the Bay area.

People’s choice: Some Niners’ fans seem infatuated with the prospect of taking a skilled-position player such as Fournette or Clemson WR Mike Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who hate clicking on links

Top 8 mock by beat writers

  1. Browns- Garrett
  2. Niners- Thomas
  3. Bears-Hooker
  4. Jags- Allen
  5. Titans-Adams
  6. Jets- Lattimore
  7. Chargers-Peppers
  8. Panthers- Person took Fournette

In that same scenario I'd agree with him. I'm almost 50/50 on Corey Davis and Fournette now myself.

I like Fournette for all the same reasons everyone else does. He's a beast and potential game changer with the ability to take any carry to the house. However the concerns about his ability to play as effectively out of Shotgun the majority of snaps does cause a reason for pause and needs expert evaluation. 

I like Thomas too but question his transition to a 4-3 end vs 3-4 end. Either way he's gone in this scenario.

Corey Davis just seems to be exactly what the doctor ordered for our offense. He would be a huge upgrade over Ginn in every category a rookie possibly could except pure speed.  I also believe the departure of Ginn makes WR our biggest immediate need. 

Still love Jamal Adams too. He would be a monster upgrade to our secondary. We have a short term fix in Mike Adam's and the D as a whole looks much better on paper for the 2017 season than offense does. 

Those are the really the only 4 I can say id be super excited about at 8. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

All that link tells me is that Person tends to get most of his Panther's information from reading the Huddle... lol.

Exactly.  Alluding to the horrific drop off after Garrett and Thomas and crapping on Barnett by not even mentioning him in the article is a dead giveaway he gets it all from here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We won't have to 

1 hour ago, panther4life said:

For those who hate clicking on links

Top 8 mock by beat writers

  1. Browns- Garrett
  2. Niners- Thomas
  3. Bears-Hooker
  4. Jags- Allen
  5. Titans-Adams
  6. Jets- Lattimore
  7. Chargers-Peppers
  8. Panthers- Person took Fournette

In that same scenario I'd agree with him. I'm almost 50/50 on Corey Davis and Fournette now myself.

I like Fournette for all the same reasons everyone else does. He's a beast and potential game changer with the ability to take any carry to the house. However the concerns about his ability to play as effectively out of Shotgun the majority of snaps does cause a reason for pause and needs expert evaluation. 

I like Thomas too but question his transition to a 4-3 end vs 3-4 end. Either way he's gone in this scenario.

Corey Davis just seems to be exactly what the doctor ordered for our offense. He would be a huge upgrade over Ginn in every category a rookie possibly could except pure speed.  I also believe the departure of Ginn makes WR our biggest immediate need. 

Still love Jamal Adams too. He would be a monster upgrade to our secondary. We have a short term fix in Mike Adam's and the D as a whole looks much better on paper for the 2017 season than offense does. 

Those are the really the only 4 I can say id be super excited about at 8. 

 

 

Won't have to play out of the shotgun if the o-line does their damn job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...