Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Executive: Myles Garrett May Not Be The First Overall Pick


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So, the Panthers have been in the flirt scenes of a possible trade-up to 2. With the mindless, lazy media writers out there, they assumed the Panthers must be targeting Fournette with such. It seems like a lot of the media are assuming we're really high on Fournette and would've likely been the target of a trade up to 2.

The following shatters that theory and brings to light a logical one. Have a look:

If Garrett isn't the number 1 overall pick, the Panthers better get the phones ready and armed. I fully believe it'd be worth giving up whatever is necessary to get the next Julius Peppers of the NFL. I'm a huge supporter of this, and while it's a pipe dream, it's certainly a nice one to have.

UPDATE: 

50/50 in Cleveland's camp. Let the smoke rise.

To put in perspective the value of trading up from 8 to 2, take last year as example:

C6pSzQaV0AA5-62.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I learned from this is that...

1. NFL Execs are uninformed, none of them really knows what is going on, and contradict each other all the time.

2. The draft needs to hurry up and get its titanus tushy over here so we can stop speculating over this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, csx said:

No thank you are giving the farm up. Not wise. In 3 years everyone is complaining about lack of offensive line or whatever else.

We honestly don't have that much holes. I would not be opposed to getting a generational physical specimen when we have a lot already patched up.

Imagine this on the same line:

MylesGarrett3.0.gif

MylesGarrett.gif

giphy.gif.42bd1b8a2dc98c706168eae89501743d.gif

These two rushing the passer... oh boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Byrdman4real said:

SF would be stupid not to take him

Disagree-they have multiple needs and far bigger needs than DE.  Their best play is getting what they can for the pick.  Garrett visited the Jaguars recently-who knows whether they think he could fall to 4 or if they're interested in trading up, but Garrett to the Browns at 1 is absolutely no sure thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My comments go back to what I would have done in 2023. That is really when everything veered off of what I thought was good and well. I wanted to keep Wilks, re-sign Darnold and Foreman, and trade down in the draft to take Torrance, Kincaid, Charbonnet, or Mims obviously depending on where they fell. Knowing what was coming the next draft class, that was the prudent thing to do.    I’d still take Warren over Tet, or even Matthew Golden over Tet. Bryce needs guys who get open because right now, no one on this roster creates separation forcing Bryce to be a pinpoint passer which is insane because he’s 5’9. Give me receiving options that create space.    they called him a Mini-Mahomes yet have done nothing similar to what the Chiefs have done to capitalize on those “traits”. It’s absurd. Give me a tight end who can back yard ball, a slasher at running back, a power back, and two 4.3 receivers with exceptional route running.    That’s how you build around what Bryce has done well. 
    • We should have traded down, taken Torrance, taken Charbonnet and Mims. Then gone defense. Re-signed Foreman and Darnold. If we sucked again, then you get a shot at Daniels, Maye, Williams, or Nix. You get to keep DJ Moore and stack a core of talent. 
    • What is it that Cam is supposed to do differently? He is a running back. Dart will learn to slide, and eventually he won’t be playing with PS elevation receivers so he won’t have to run nearly as much. 
×
×
  • Create New...