Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Roy Williams says Richard Marshall is terrible


RazzleDazzle

Recommended Posts

SSSHHHHH!!! don't tell!:rolleyes:

lol

and as far as the pass, it was a drop. we had 2 chances for ints. Gamble drop one that went through his hands and out of bounds in the 1st quarter. Davis would have had one had he turn around earlier, and someone else dropped one, but of course sinces its tony romo and the cowboys no one will speak of it.

Munnerlyn is better than Marshall by far, and right now, that isn't saying much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seemed almost like everytime we saw a ball go near Roy, Captain was on him. Why our Rookie 3rd Corner who is short, was against their number one tall WR, i donn't know??

well Captain at least goes out to play each snap. Marshall and Gamble are just giving plays up and letting guys eat up yardage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering half of his yards came against a zone that had him on the side of Captain Munnerlyn and Charles Godfrey...I don't really see where he comes off saying Marshall sucks.

Yeah, Marshall didn't spend much time at all covering him one on one, so I don't know where Williams gets this crap from.

Hell, Witten was the only guy they could even complete a pass to for about half of that game anyway.

And BTW, Munnerlyn did miss a crucial tackle on Williams right at the LOS on one third down play that could have gotten the defense off the field, so it's not like he was really that great either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Marshall didn't spend much time at all covering him one on one, so I don't know where Williams gets this crap from.

Hell, Witten was the only guy they could even complete a pass to for about half of that game anyway.

And BTW, Munnerlyn did miss a crucial tackle on Williams right at the LOS on one third down play that could have gotten the defense off the field, so it's not like he was really that great either.

At least we can give him some slack for being a rookie. What's Marshall and Gamble's excuse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Marshall didn't spend much time at all covering him one on one, so I don't know where Williams gets this crap from.

Hell, Witten was the only guy they could even complete a pass to for about half of that game anyway.

Williams has adopted the "Dallas Attitude" that seems to creep into the very soul of their players and ALL of their fans. Amazing how Dallas fans still think their team is God's gift to football despite not winning one playoff game in over a decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least we can give him some slack for being a rookie. What's Marshall and Gamble's excuse?

I didn't think that Marshall and Gamble were that bad in the first place. It was those big runs that really killed us, along with all the 3 and outs by the offense and poor ST's play. As Unicar said, they were in a zone a lot of the time anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well even if we took diverging paths getting there...our overall assessment of Shough is the same (bolded) lol so I guess that's what matters.  What you call "playing at a level that looks like a veteran starter" is the same thing I'm referencing when I talk about his poise.  Although I still wonder how truly "bad" of a team the Saints are.  Their defense is middle-of-the-road, and their offense does have some good pieces (Olave, Juwan Johnson) outside of running back which is the position most everyone agrees is relatively plug-and-play.  I'm not going to pretend to know anything about the majority of NFL team's o-lines lol but I'm assuming Saints are not great there, although Shough's pressure % seems to have been quite low (and steadily improving) over the last four weeks (20 -> 16.7 -> 15.0 -> 13.0) so maybe they've been playing better as of late, or perhaps Shough himself deserves credit for that.   Some of the language I'm hearing about Shough, including talking about how he's way above league average in several categories, makes it sound like Shough is having a rookie season on par with like a CJ Stroud who established himself as basically a Top 5-10 QB his rookie season.  Maybe that's on me though, I don't mean to attribute anything to you that I'm sure you don't agree with.
    • Since your being selective (and somewhat deceptive) with your comparisons, I'll throw this up so we can compare apples to apples. Both Young and Shough have played against the Rams. Young went: 15/20 (75%) for 191 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INTs with a 147.1 QB rating Shough went: 15/24 (62.5%) for 176 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT with a 81.2 QB rating   Both Young and Shough have played against the Buccs. Young went: 21/32 (65%) for 206 yards, 2 TDs, 0 INTs with a 102.5 QB rating Shough went: 13/20 (65%) for 176 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT with a 65.4 QB rating   Both Young and Shough have played against the Falcons. Young went: 31/45 (75%) for 448 yards, 3 TDs, 0 INTs with a 123.2 rating Shough went: 30/43 (69.7%) for 243 yards, 0TD, 1 INT with a 74 QB rating   Seriously, in what world is Shough a better QB.
    • Freddie? For this game? Seriously? I don’t get it. Hope we get the best version of Freddie tonight.
×
×
  • Create New...