Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade KB for a first next year?


t96

Recommended Posts

While him having a history of getting overweight in the offseason makes me question he dedication, we cannot trade him now.

Aside from the fact that the best he would bring us is a late 2nd or early 3rd, we would be cutting our own throat if we traded him.  I do believe he'll be 100% ready when the season starts, and will be a huge presence for us this season.  Imagine the difficulty teams will have trying to cover him, with his crazy catch radius, along with Olsen, McCaffrey, and Samuels.  Somebody is always going to be open.  But if you trade him, you make the defenses job much easier.

I expect that he will be the biggest weapon he's ever been for us this season (even if he doesn't get as many yards) because teams cannot focus the brunt of their pass defense on him anymore.  The threat he offers us will help make the offense a very dangerous group.

Then we can evaluate him next offseason.  But we can't even contemplate getting rid of him now...no matter what the pick.  I want a Super Bowl, and that means having every weapon we can get our hands on at our disposal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is gonna offer that for Kelvin; he hasn't lived up to being a first round pick, even as late as he was taken. Now most of his value has worn off as there's only one year left on his rookie contract AND there's legitimate question as to whether they should exercise his option.

Jamie Collins netted a third, Dwayne Allen a fourth, Ealy only moved us a few spots in the second, Timmy Jernigan did the same for Baltimore in the third.

I'd be shocked at any offers earlier than a 4th, but they should jump at it if that happens.

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, PhillyB said:

thank you. dude effectively put up two thousand yard seasons in his first two playing years, both of which were incidentally down years on the offense.

he needs to get his poo together but dumping him would be tremendously shortsighted and detrimental to this offense

The offense was actually better when he wasn't playing. But hopefully with more speed added he we finally fit in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About a month ago this board ripped Voth to shreds for asking a (not so obvious) question about KB's 5th year being picked up. Today on the Huddle there are multiple threads about KB not being motivated, us trading him, etc... We sure are a funny fan base. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...