Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

EPIC Offence or EPIC Failure


CanadianCat

Recommended Posts

I feel like the popular off-season topic that everyone is talking about is the EPIC offence we WILL have next year. Like how could we not with the addition of 2 rookies!?

Everyone seems to be writing about it and as much as Im getting excited about it I feel like its probably an unfair expectation. I highly doubt our new offence will run through these 2 guys like everyone else is saying. I imagine them more helping the other starters get more space...primarily Olsen. The entire offense will still run through Olsen 

The Panthers Have the Weapons to Conquer the NFL with Option Football

The Cardinals and Panthers Are the Future of Football

How Two Versatile Prospects Are Disrupting the NFL Draft

Mr. Everything: Christian McCaffrey is the nation's best player, but he can't be summed up by his achievements

If Shula doesn't create the greatest offense ever built will the media be calling for his head??

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

When we make the playoffs: Huddle, "Epic Success"

If we miss the playoffs: Huddle, "Epic Failure"

 

Well, actually it depends on if we won or lost last game.  People jump on and off the bandwagon weekly for the most part.  Its sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you seen a gameday thread? Threads created after gameday?

 

The huddle is all about unfair expectations. The huddle is not about logic. The huddle revolves around creating all-star Madden teams based of stats and early random projections.

 

Would it be so bad to wait until our rookies play one game...even preseason. Would it be so bad to be realistic knowing our qb just came back from surgery, and our LT has not played a single game with this online? Just wait and see how Shula somehow changes everything he's done so far and creates a new offense?

 

No, this is not the huddle off season way. Instead we will criticize anyone who doesn't claim our offense or team will be godly as haters and ramble on about how dominant the Panthers will be.

 

The proceed to post mind numbingly, retarded ass knee-jerk reactions to every single small significant and insignificant thing that happens in every game and wonder why the Panthers fail yet again. 

 

Then as expectations finally begin to subside and come back to logic and reality the Panthers will show flashes of what is to come and give hope to huddlers. At this point  huddlers will be so happy we are at least looking like we have a plan and thus begin the cycle once again of growing, unrealistic expectations.

 

This is the huddle way, the way of mediocrity, way of never having winning records two years in a row...the way of the Carolina Panthers.

 

Be excited of the possibilities but just sit the fug down and wait to be shows something to get excited about for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...