Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Underwear


imminent rogaine

Recommended Posts

After a broken wrist, I started working out again toward the beginning of the year. Since my legs and butt are bigger, I'm running out of real estate in my traditional cotton boxers. The leg holes are super constricting and its really frustrating. I tried some cotton boxer-briefs looking for stretch in the leg holes and they ride up so bad that I feel like I'm wearing regular briefs. I basically just walk around uncomfortable and tugging at my underwear all day. The only thing I have that is comfortable are synthetic compression shorts that come pretty far down my upper leg.

Does anyone have a recommendation for underwear that provides flexibility for movement but doesn't ride up?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

Does the seam of your pants not bother you? I feel like I need some level of protection from seams and zippers.

Not really. I've gotten used to it. Every now and again I may feel a pinch somewhere but overall  love it. Breathability, freedom and less laundry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RealBitsOfPanther said:

Did you get the cheap boxer briefs? Those ones suck. My wife got me the hanes premium ones (I think that's what they're called?) from Target and those are money. 

Jockey's seem to pretty good for working out,  they stay where you put them, and don't bunch up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, lightsout said:

As a man with large thighs and butt, I can confirm that the pricier Hanes boxer briefs are where it's at. Or find some comfy man-ties (big thighs require this sacrifice sometimes). 

Thanks. I'll try them. I see that they offer a line with longer legs. My issue, I think, is that my legs are a little large relative to my waist - 33. Hopefully this will help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...