Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Underwear


imminent rogaine

Recommended Posts

After a broken wrist, I started working out again toward the beginning of the year. Since my legs and butt are bigger, I'm running out of real estate in my traditional cotton boxers. The leg holes are super constricting and its really frustrating. I tried some cotton boxer-briefs looking for stretch in the leg holes and they ride up so bad that I feel like I'm wearing regular briefs. I basically just walk around uncomfortable and tugging at my underwear all day. The only thing I have that is comfortable are synthetic compression shorts that come pretty far down my upper leg.

Does anyone have a recommendation for underwear that provides flexibility for movement but doesn't ride up?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, imminent rogaine said:

Does the seam of your pants not bother you? I feel like I need some level of protection from seams and zippers.

Not really. I've gotten used to it. Every now and again I may feel a pinch somewhere but overall  love it. Breathability, freedom and less laundry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RealBitsOfPanther said:

Did you get the cheap boxer briefs? Those ones suck. My wife got me the hanes premium ones (I think that's what they're called?) from Target and those are money. 

Jockey's seem to pretty good for working out,  they stay where you put them, and don't bunch up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, lightsout said:

As a man with large thighs and butt, I can confirm that the pricier Hanes boxer briefs are where it's at. Or find some comfy man-ties (big thighs require this sacrifice sometimes). 

Thanks. I'll try them. I see that they offer a line with longer legs. My issue, I think, is that my legs are a little large relative to my waist - 33. Hopefully this will help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's true. I did actually mean the FO but that's a fair point.
    • A guy like Jones at average pay is going to not work out IMO. The 20 million difference to spend elsewhere is too large of a hurdle when the QB plays good but not carry the team good. They are in the sweet spot currently at cost to value with him. Darnold is pretty much the same. Good in a limited role but lean on him and he will fold. Tua didn't beat good teams when it had to be on his back to be the difference, and that was true when his team was stacked. All of Murray's talent has resulted in 1 winning season for them and 1 wildcard loss. The NFL has an overpaying mediocre QB issue. At the right price it's not an issue but can be a positive. It inevitably leads to a worse roster which becomes a poo show. NY gave up their RB because they paid Jones and proved that. The first is most likely leading to the second. Baker is bucking that trend but he was always the best of any of that group, even if his time here was pretty much the worst setup possible.
    • If you only factor passing, there is a VERY mild argument Dalton is more efficient but it's ignoring the threat Cam was as a big play literally every snap. With his feet OR through the air. Dalton was never that type of player. I would say Dalton over 200 is a very safe bet. 
×
×
  • Create New...