Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A word on sacks


lightsout

Recommended Posts

Some people in the game thread have this idea that EVERY throw has to be within three seconds. No. It doesn't. Because not every play is a quick hitter. Some require time to open up. 

 

Sacks were not on Cam. The first, Kalil got destroyed off the edge. Another, Williams got destroyed. 

 

Blame Shula for putting this offense in terrible situations where it's obvious we're passing, allowing the d to pin their ears back and come after the pass rush. It's not about Cam holding the ball forever. If you think that, find the coaches film and please point out the obvious open receiver that Cam failed to see fast enough. Until then, don't talk football if you don't know football.

 

Funny thing is, some of you saying Cam was holding the ball too long were defending Matt Kalil last week when I said he was inconsistent and getting worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Camvp said:

If this were true then all the sacks would have been within 2 seconds or less.  But at least two were closer to 4 seconds of Cam standing still in a pocket collapsing around him after 3+ seconds, including one of them that contributed to falling out of FG range

Find the open receiver. Sack is better than throwing into coverage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...