Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Dwayne Jarrett Touchdown Challenge


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

I think some ground rules need to be laid down. A few suggestions:

1. There needs to be a time limit in which you must eat said underwear. Nothing too strict. I'd say 1 hour.

2. The underwear must not be blended or put in a food processor. However, cutting it into swallowable pieces is acceptable.

3. The underwear must not be mixed with other, tastier, food products (i.e. No underwear stew, potpies, sundaes, etc.). Also, no hot sauce or ketchup.

4. They cannot be a new pair of underwear, they must be thoroughly worn. (This one will be rather difficult to prove. Hopefully you have enough honor to abide.)

I considered stipulating that they must be the pair that you put on Sunday morning and wore throughout the game. But I guess dirty underwear might be asking a bit much. What you guys think?

Rofl, nicely done, nicely done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol sorry for tarnishing the huddle w/it.....i will remove it when the panthers win they're 1st game. pray we dont go 0-16

I don't mind it. Not my first choice... usually a few of the other posters fill my "almost porn, but not quite porn" needs when browsing the forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One day near the end of the season, we are going to throw it up to him in the endzone against a 5"10 cornerback then there is gonna be a collective "Oh, maybe we should throw to the tallest WR on the team with good hands in short yardage and goal situations".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...