Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The stadium was pretty quiet yesterday


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Randolph Panther said:

My seats are way up high in Section 521 but our section was inundated with Bills fans.  In all the top of our section was probably 75 percent Bills fans.  I couldnt really tell in the lower level from where I was sitting but the Bills probably had 30-40 percent of the fans up top.  

The upper seats may have had plenty of Bills fans, but there were hardly any Bills fans in 120 or any surrounding sections at all and I honestly don't remember seeing a lot in the concourse either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tiger7_88 said:

Pounding the ball for short or loss of yardage into the Buffalo front four brick wall for an entire game is not a dependable formula for fan excitement.

Panthers moved the ball well in the first half and completely dominated the TOP. They just couldn't do anything with it.

I sat in two sections yesterday, both upper deck then my usual lower deck after halftime. that stadium was not close to full. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, donttreadonme said:

As an Ashevillian, I get this. It's a shame because Charlotte's beer scene has exploded over the last few years.

On the lower level, I think the south side of the stadium, they have a pretty large craft beer area. Everything's on tap and there's a decent selection. Don't know about the upper level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...