Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So About Worley Giving Up "Cushion" On That Last Drive Against Holmes


Saca312

Recommended Posts

So, the Panthers corners were solid all game. However, all of a sudden Worley apparently does "bad" once again and is a "weak link" when he gives up some cushion to Holmes on the drive.

Well. Take a look at what Worley's doing pre-snap.

Appears some communication issues occurred from Worley to coaches. Without knowing what even he was supposed to do, he tried to wing it. Frustration ensued.

Worley's not at fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

So, the Panthers corners were solid all game. However, all of a sudden Worley apparently does "bad" once again and is a "weak link" when he gives up some cushion to Holmes on the drive.

Well. Take a look at what Worley's doing pre-snap.

Appears some communication issues occurred from Worley to coaches. Without knowing what even he was supposed to do, he tried to wing it. Frustration ensued.

Worley's not at fault.

Everyone else got the call. Are you sure it's not his fault?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

Something obviously messed up. Who knows.

Well they had to be using hand signals so he either missed them or couldn't see them. I still think if ten out of eleven guys get the signal, then it's your fault you didn't get it. And like @*FreeFua* said, know the situation and man up like the other corner is doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uncfan888 said:

Well they had to be using hand signals so he either missed them or couldn't see them. I still think if ten out of eleven guys get the signal, then it's your fault you didn't get it. And like @*FreeFua* said, know the situation and man up like the other corner is doing

Either way really it wasn't reflective of his play, rather just not aware of what's going on. 

I wouldn't fault his skill being an issue. But I can see how him not being aware is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...