Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

That Packers #26th ranked Defense...


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

They are amoung one of the worst ranked defenses we have faced in the league. We “should” be able to move the ball on offense. They let Cleveland hang 21 points and take them into OT today.

However we will almost certainly be facing Aaron Rodgers returning from his IR hiatus. Our Defense will need to get to him early and keep him out of rhythm. 

Also, I kinda wish Tony Romo would call this game with Rodgers returning. We would be hearing PTSD flashbacks live on air from when we took Romo out of the Thanksgiving game in ‘15. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

If Rodgers is %100 he will torch this secondary with ease, he will remind everyone why he’s the best QB in football.

 

This is the only game remaining in the schedule I’m not confident in what so ever 

I'm worried that the Packers will be very rejuvenated.   They are still a big long shot for the playoffs but they have met their goal of being 7-6 when Rodgers returns.  If he's back we will need our best effort to win.  This defense's performance against Brees this year does not have me optimistic for their ability to stop Rodgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good Panthers team should always be feared in December, the way they stifled an elite Minnesota team today who would've had at least 2 more touchdowns w/o the defense showing up I'm not worried about the last 3 games, they'll take care of business at the stadium and they probably don't even need to beat Atlanta to make the playoffs, but will go for the w anyway to get the division crown (N.O. has to lose another game for that to happen of course).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

If Rodgers is %100 he will torch this secondary with ease, he will remind everyone why he’s the best QB in football.

 

This is the only game remaining in the schedule I’m not confident in what so ever 

Weren’t you one of those that said Carolina would lose 38-10 to the Vikings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

I'm worried that the Packers will be very rejuvenated.   They are still a big long shot for the playoffs but they have met their goal of being 7-6 when Rodgers returns.  If he's back we will need our best effort to win.  This defense's performance against Brees this year does not have me optimistic for their ability to stop Rodgers.

Actually we played Brees very well. It seems like people forget the punt return fumble, punter turning the ball over, Peppers penalty and Matt Kalils 30 yards of Face Mask penalties and Funchess stone hands in that game.

those plays,.. the game was a lot closer than the score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...