Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter - Giants interviewed Gettleman today


MVPccaffrey

Recommended Posts

 

The best GM by far in Panthers history, fired by our creep owner, is potentially about to take a job with one of the most well run franchises in NFL history, and a top 2 pick to start things off. 

 

Why oh why couldn't mister shake-your-rump have gotten exposed an offseason ago sigh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Camvp said:

 

The best GM by far in Panthers history, fired by our creep owner, is potentially about to take a job with one of the most well run franchises in NFL history, and a top 2 pick to start things off. 

 

Why oh why couldn't mister shake-your-rump have gotten exposed an offseason ago sigh

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's up with the love affair with DG? He was great at managing the cap but aside from that, he was average at best. missed countless times in the draft, signed some horrible free agents, and single handedly cost us a playoff birth in 2016. 

not to mention people hated him, including TD and Olsen, which is saying a lot.

maybe Hurney isn't the answer, but the Panthers can do far better than DG. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

What's up with the love affair with DG? He was great at managing the cap but aside from that, he was average at best. missed countless times in the draft, signed some horrible free agents, and single handedly cost us a playoff birth in 2016. 

not to mention people hated him, including TD and Olsen, which is saying a lot.

maybe Hurney isn't the answer, but the Panthers can do far better than DG. 

Fixed the shitshow that Hurney created

Signed vets/contributors at low prices

Cut said vets when they weren't producing and didn't over pay* (*Matt Kalil excluded. Can't defend that one, hated it from the get go. But still, vast vast majority of his signings didn't hurt us financially)

Put together a super Bowl team while cash strapped

Re-signed Luke and Cam

Drafted in the mid to late 20's as opposed to the 10's so it's kind of expected the best talent wouldn't always be available, but he still got decent guys. Not all first round picks are equal.

4 out of 5 years in which he put a team together they went to the playoffs* (*pending a victory this sunday)

Had the most successful 5 year span this team has ever had. 

Not a cuck like Hurney

brought us the term "Hogmollies"

Gettleman might not have been the best GM ever, but he's certainly the best we've ever had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dldove77 said:

DG's actions with Josh Norman are enough to be on my hate list for life. 

Honestly couldn't give less of a poo about it. 

Norman wouldn't have fixed last season. It was injuries that did us in. 

Plus if we had Norman we wouldn't have Peppers again, Short locked up long term, Addison, and the option to re-sign either Norwell or Star this offseason, possibly both. 

But the redskins have Norman and his 20 million/year contract and will have missed the playoffs in consecutive years while having to decide on whether or not to keep paying him or a franchise friggin QB.

Keeping Norman in a Rivera defensive scheme is short sighted and a poor allocation of funds. He was a luxury, and it would have been nice to have had him, but he would probably be gone this year anyway and we wouldn't have been in as good of a position financially for the long term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Honestly couldn't give less of a poo about it. 

Norman wouldn't have fixed last season. It was injuries that did us in. 

Plus if we had Norman we wouldn't have Peppers again, Short locked up long term, Addison, and the option to re-sign either Norwell or Star this offseason, possibly both. 

But the redskins have Norman and his 20 million/year contract and will have missed the playoffs in consecutive years while having to decide on whether or not to keep paying him or a franchise friggin QB.

Keeping Norman in a Rivera defensive scheme is short sighted and a poor allocation of funds. He was a luxury, and it would have been nice to have had him, but he would probably be gone this year anyway and we wouldn't have been in as good of a position financially for the long term. 

So that's one hate list and one not hate list. 

Whether we kept him long term or not, it was handled poorly. He's not my kind of guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Fixed the shitshow that Hurney created

Signed vets/contributors at low prices

Cut said vets when they weren't producing and didn't over pay

Put together a super Bowl team while cash strapped

Re-signed Luke and Cam

Drafted in the mid to late 20's as opposed to the 10's so it's kind of expected the best talent wouldn't always be available, but he still got decent guys. Not all first round picks are equal.

4 out of 5 years in which he put a team together they went to the playoffs* (*pending a victory this sunday)

Had the most successful 5 year span this team has ever had. 

Not a cuck like Hurney

brought us the term "Hogmollies"

Gettleman might not have been the best GM ever, but he's certainly the best we've ever had. 

If you are going to give him credit for all his successes, then you have to also give him credit for his failures - and he did have some big ones.  Rescinding franchise tag on Norman was a colossal mistake that completely changed the trajectory (and not in a good way) of our 2016 season.  He is a cost-first type of guy with a take it or leave it approach.  I think if he had worked with Norman a little bit he would have stayed (and for less than what Washington gave him).  After that mishap, he then proceeded to give turnstile M. Kalil $55 mil which still doesn't make sense (and even more so given his focus on the bottom line).

Overall I think his positives outweighed his negatives and will agree he was a very solid GM.  Just dont be surprised when he sends Eli packing and alienates himself to entire Giants fanbase in his first year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...