Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC Playoff Scenarios


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

Saw this over on /r/panthers (credit to ajthomas5 for the graphic) and figured I'd try to list the different scenarios based on this:

v8yAXcE6JoqN3fBNs30L5lqx6Xk6dDmXUAMdkzFQJAQ.png?w=1024&s=59b913d125bc39b3fa021847448f1244

Alright, so here's the scenarios as I can make sense of them anyways:

#1. Vikings win, Rams win, Saints win, we win: Seeding basically stays the exact same depending on what Seattle does as they could knock ATL out in that scenario.  We go to New Orleans.

#2. Vikings win, Rams win, Saints win, we lose: Once again, seeding stays the exact same except this time Seattle is eliminated.  We go to New Orleans.

#3. Vikings win, Rams win, Saints lose, we lose: Same as scenario #2.

#4. Vikings win, Rams lose, Saints lose, we lose: Again, the same thing as above.

#5. Vikings win, Rams lose, Saints win, we win or lose:  Win or lose we're stuck with the 5th seed here.  However, the Saints gain the 3rd seed and we'd be heading off to Los Angeles instead.

#6. Vikings win, Rams win, Saints lose, we win (4th seed): Things get a tad different here.  We're the 4 seed but we still play the Saints... albeit this time in Charlotte.

#7. Vikings win, Rams lose, Saints lose, we win (3rd seed): Congratulations to everyone wanting to avoid the Saints... we just avoided the Saints.  Now either Seattle or Atlanta comes to Charlotte depending on who won the Seattle/Arizona game.  Meanwhile the Saints travel out to LA.

#8. Vikings lose, Rams win, Saints lose, we win (3rd seed): Same as scenario #7.

#9. Vikings lose, Rams lose, Saints lose, we win (2nd seed): Well, I'm sure you all know this one already since it's the best-case scenario we've all hoped for... but yeah, this is our only path to the #2 seed.  First round bye and we get a weekend of stress-free football and just watch a bunch of other playoff teams beat up on each other.

That's pretty much it.  There's a few more scenarios but they're redundant.  Any scenario where we lose or the Saints win and we're locked into the 5th seed and heading down to New Orleans.  Any scenario where we win and Seattle wins and Atlanta is knocked out.  Seattle loses and Atlanta is locked into the 6th seed.

Our first priority should obviously be winning our game first and casting every bit of voodoo you can to hope Tampa Bay can finally pull one out against New Orleans.  The bit of good news is the Bucs obviously haven't quit and they'll be at home for this game.

Aside from that, assuming we get this far, there's a pretty good chance the 49ers beat the Rams.  The Rams could possibly be trying to rest up some as there's no scenario where they get the 2nd seed (they needed the Vikings to go 0-2)... so they're locked into either the 3rd or 4th seed.  Not really much to play for and since all the playoff team games are going on at the same time then they can't determine their wildcard match up by choosing to win or lose ahead of time.

Also, the 49ers have just flat out looked a TON better since Jimmy G took over.  Even if they don't rest then it's not going to be some easy win.  If they do rest then you can likely chalk that up to an ass-whoopin' by the 49ers with the way they've been playing.

The Vikings... well I don't really expect them to lose.  Bye week is at stake and they'll be at home against the Bears.  Yeah, the same Bears that already ruined our seeding once this year so I doubt they'll be doing us any favors this time around.  Now, if only Green Bay had played Rodgers the other night they likely would have beat them and we wouldn't have to worry about putting our 2nd seed hopes in the hands of the Bears.

Let me know if I fuged up or missed any, but I think that's basically it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jesse said:

Her s another picture for everyone: NFC Scenarios. I personally found that one a little easier to read. Either way, we have an uphill battle if we want to host a playoff game.

All we need is to handle our business against Atlanta and the Saints lose to the Bucs.  It's not that crazy to think  we host at least one playoff game considering how tough Tampa played us, Atlanta and the Lions... all of which were fighting for their playoff lives.

They'll also be in Tampa for that game.  I mean, more than likely the Saints will win because they have a lot to play for... but at least we know those pirate bastards ain't just going to roll over and die like they have in years past at the end of the season.  They seem to at least be playing for pride this season which is good enough for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Reebis21 said:

Maybe i missed it but is there a scenario where us and the Saints win next week, but they get 3rd and we get 5th?

Yeah my bad I left that out... was still a bit half asleep typing all that up.  We'd be playing the Rams in that case.

If the Saints win and 49ers win they get the 3rd seed.  We'd be heading out to LA then to play the Rams.  I'll add it to the OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RelaxImaPro said:

Yeah my bad I left that out... was still a bit half asleep typing all that up.  We'd be playing the Rams in that case.

If the Saints win and 49ers win they get the 3rd seed.  We'd be heading out to LA then to play the Rams.  I'll add it to the OP.

So if the Saints win, as long as 9ers win, we play the Rams...realistically, this is the scenario I’m thinking has the best shot to happen that winds up in our favor...a “home” game for the Rams won’t be anywhere near as bad as visiting New Orleans...and then I’m not scared of Philly or Minnesota that next round 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Reebis21 said:

So no matter if the Saints win, as long as 9ers win, we play the Rams...realistically, this is the scenario I’m thinking has the best shot to happen that winds up in our favor...a “home” game for the Rams won’t be anywhere near as bad as visiting New Orleans...and then I’m not scared of Philly or Minnesota that next round 

Not quite.  If the Saints lose, Rams lose and we lose the seeding remains unchanged since all those losses just canceled each other out.  However, if the Saints win and Rams lose then the Saints move to the 3rd seed, Rams move into 4th and we'll play the Rams regardless of if we win or lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now... and I know this has been said several times... but if only we hadn't completely shat the bed against Chicago.  We'd be the damn 2nd seed right now.  After everything that's went down this season and all the bullshit, lol, we'd be the fuging 2nd seed had we not straight up committed suicide on the field that day.

Didn't Trubisky only complete like 2 passes or some poo?  Jeeze... that game reaaallly fuging hurts now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I dunno if I missed the thread but we got flexed to 425 right?

Yeah.  I think all the games with seeding implications are flexed to 4:25 IIRC.  They canceled SNF next week since it fell on New Years Eve night and shuffled around all the games for that week.

So yeah.  All the pointless games at 1, all the playoff important games at 4:25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is something that has irritated me for a while. I'm going to address his play during these "game winning drives," 8 of them apparently, clear up some nomenclature, and address some points specifically. The games in question.  Also responding to this  What is a Game Winning Drive? This is an undefined term and therefore can be whatever the person using it wants it to be. The term itself removes context from a result which lends itself to be used by people arguing in bad faith. Some people like to attribute every time Bryce is on the field in a situation like this to him "winning the game," or just kind of associating him with a "Game Winning Drive" and leaving it open ended. There's no criteria for what a GWD is. If you had a spectrum of what this could encompass it, on one end you'd have a single player being responsible, and on the other you'd have all 11. Put another way, a QB going 9/9 for 99 yards and rushing the final yard himself is on one end of the spectrum, and on the other is the blocking tight end who was just kinda there. Hey, he was on the field too.  For these purposes, I'm going to hedge and say a GWD is something you know when you see it. I'm not going to claim Bryce hasn't had one, but I'm absolutely not going to give him credit for every one of them. Reasonable people can disagree at the margins, but generally I think we'll be in accord more than not. I also want to look at the context of these, because I think we need to keep in mind how the team got to that position. There's a certain "mystique" about the term game winning drive. Like all of a sudden, when the game is on the line, the QB just turns it on and becomes a better player and blah blah blah. Nothing else matters because he Just Wins Games It neatly ignores the circumstances that led to a team needing a last second drive against some of the worst teams in the league, and this should be taken into consideration. This was an argument made in favor of Delhomme for years...until a certain game that we won't mention.  In reality, defenses are tired by the end of the game, defensive coordinators will generally give up yards in exchange for clock, and offensive playcallers will be more aggressive. That's really it.  But Fiz, why now? Why tonight? People are building this narrative about Bryce Young because it allows them to overlook the rest of his performance, his role in getting the team into whatever hole they're trying to crawl out of, and minimizing the contributions of everyone else (or assigning blame to players other than him) to make him look like he's better than he is/being let down. People in the national media with motivations I can only speculate on are doing this and it's irritating. Also it's very slow at work tonight and it's either this or reruns of ER.  I'll be looking at the final drives here (more or less) when the Panthers were in a position to win or tie. I'll also be adding some context as a I go. So lets just look at these.  2023 Houston at Carolina - 5/10 41 yds, FG  The Panthers drove to the Houston 44, then ran it 6 times in a row for the final 12 yards before the Texans started diving offsides. Panthers weren't just killing clock; Bryce had already taken one sack on the drive (six on the day!), and I don't think any of us feel like Pineiro had a 60 yarder in him in 2023. He did have 5 FG in him though, which is all the scoring the Panthers could muster. It was enough.  Game Winning Drive: eh, Bryce didn't really cover himself in glory here. If you think getting the team into range for a 60 yard attempt before letting the RB finish the job is a GWD, then we're going to have some problems. I'm generally kinda dubious of the whole "wow he set up a long range field goal for the win what a legend." Why yes early career Tom Brady was a fraud carried by Adam Vinatieri why do you ask  Atlanta at Carolina - 5/6 53 yds, GW FG Game Winning Drive: yeah, I think so. It was a miserable 9-6 win against the Desmond Ridder led Atlanta Falcons. Prior to this final drive, Bryce was a whopping 13/18 for 114 yds and the offense had managed 6 whole points. Hard for me to say here they weren't in the position to need a GWD because of how ineffective Bryce was. That said, I think it's fair he did this one on his own. Credit where credit's due little guy, you did it.  2024 New Orleans at Carolina - 1/4, 38 yds Game Winning Drive: not really. Panthers win 23-22. Sanders scored from 16 yards out on the ground, Carolina was only there because of a DPI (a theme with Bryce), Bryce took a sack on the 2 point conversion, and then the defense stopped the Saints afterwards. Prior to this Bryce had a very Bryce esque 15/22 133 1 Td 1 Int performance going so he was just kinda there.  Again, this is where context comes into play. Completing 1/4 passes does not "leading a game winning drive" make. If that's the dividing line, everyone on the field led a GWD, so the term becomes meaningless.  Carolina at Giants - 0/0  Game Winning Drive: no matter what a GWD is, it's certainly not this, and if anyone argues differently you can disregard them. Daniel Jones fumbled on the first play of overtime, Panthers ran a couple times and kicked the game winning FG. Prior to this, Bryce was terrible. Panthers were up 17-7 with 5:31 in the 3rd quarter, on the back of Chuba. From that point on, Bryce went 2/6 for 14 yards. Panthers had two 3 and outs and got just 2 first downs. Panthers overcame him here.  Arizona at Carolina - 0/0 Game Winning Drive: no. On the panthers second possession in overtime, Chuba ran it twice for 49 yards and a TD. On their first possession, Bryce completed a 1 yard checkdown, took a sack, and the Panthers punted after totaling -4 yards. Furthermore, Bryce couldn't convert a 3rd and 3 at the 2 minute warning up 3 points. Arizona got the ball back and tied the game.  Carolina at Atlanta - 5/5, 71 yards  Game Winning Drive: sure whatever have a day. For context, it's generally accepted in Atlanta sports media the defense was trying get the coordinator fired that day, which he was. I was at the game. I'm not saying the players had a conspiracy, but I'm not sure how it would look different if they did. but hey, as long as weird poo keeps happening against the Falcons, let it ride.  Miami at Carolina - 3/5, 45 yards, TD  Game Winning Drive: yes BUT. I don't want to re-litigate this. Briefly, the Dolphins have a historically bad defense, the Panthers were only trailing because of how badly Bryce played, the defense bailed the team out, and Rico was clearly the MVP. Trying to sneak this into a narrative about Bryce and his game winning drives is an attempt to hide how completely dogshit he was for most of the game. On second half drives to start, Bryce went.... 0/1 passing, took a sack, FG 2/3 passing, 18 yards, Delay of Game on Bryce, punt 2/2 passing, 16 yards, took a sack, punt  1/3 passing, 4 yards, punt  1/1 passing, 4 yds, 2 defensive penalties, 43 yd run by Rico, 1 yd TD run Absolutely dismal performance Dallas at Carolina - 3/6, 25 yards, FG  Game Winning Drive: Panthers had 34 yards rushing on this drive, and Rico rushed for more yards on the day than Bryce threw. People will want to point to the 7 yard slant to Renfrow, but that's one moment. Why do you need a 4th down conversion to kick a game winning FG against the worst defense in the league? The Renfrow catch is just as meaningful as the DPI (again) on 3rd and 7. Hard for me to say yeah Bryce gets credit for this and Rico doesn't. or Ryan Fitzgerald. People aren't going to be telling stories about where they were when Bryce got 25 yards passing to set up a 30 yard FG to beat the worst defense in the league.  Conclusion I'd say low end 3, high end 6 for what I'd actually credit Bryce for with having a game winning drive. Absolutely not for the Giants and Cardinals game. Saints game probably not.  As far as questioning which games need a GWD because of Bryce, I'd argue Miami, New York, 2023 Atlanta, and Houston definitely. League average QB play and you don't need the heroics. Bryce had multiple chances to seal the game against the Cardinals in 2024 and couldn't do it. The defense picked off the Cardinals late in the 4th quarter at their 11 yard line after the Panthers went 3 and out, including a classic Bryce check down short of the line to gain on 3rd.  About half of the time, it looks like these GWD, whomever is responsible for them, are happening in part because of what Bryce did or didn't do. I don't think league average QB play is too much to ask for. Panthers usually win these games despite of Bryce; he's an obstacle to be overcome.  Stats Taken in totality, in these situations Bryce's stats are  7 games 17/26 passing for 233, 1 TD  65% completion rating  13 ypc 8.9 ypa I'm not going to compare this to league average, I'm just going to point out you'd expect someone with 8 GWD to have more than 1 TD.  Other side of this  but what about the games in a similar situation where they DIDN'T win? Shouldn't we look at those games too? Maybe find ones where Bryce absolutely lost the game with a pick, or calling an audible into the wrong play, or spiking the ball with zero seconds on the clock after throwing into the middle of the field, or all of the turnover on downs? Maybe also go into some of the games that have been mythologized, like the Eagles game that ended on a turnover on downs where Bryce had 3rd and 4 in Eagles territory and couldn't get a first down? Yeah...someone should do that...
    • Best RB tandem in Panther history (at least for a few weeks)
×
×
  • Create New...