Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bowl Games thread


ncfan

Recommended Posts

now that there is an actual college playoff...all these random bowl games just seem like such a joke.  Hey guys, while the real teams are playing in the playoffs come check out a pointless exhibition game!!!

maybe when the NFL regular season is done the Browns and 49ers can play in an exhibition to see of any teams are interested in there free agents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

now that there is an actual college playoff...all these random bowl games just seem like such a joke.  Hey guys, while the real teams are playing in the playoffs come check out a pointless exhibition game!!!

maybe when the NFL regular season is done the Browns and 49ers can play in an exhibition to see of any teams are interested in there free agents. 

FCS has a 16 team playoff. FBS won't go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the flip side, I wouldn't be interested in any USC OL even as a UDFA. And anyone who drafts Sam Darnold in the 50 picks is an idiot. He has some real arm talent, but he's nowhere near ready to play in the NFL. I don't think he has any ability at all to read a defense pre-snap. Never saw him check out of anything. When OSU blitzed he was a sitting duck and when they dropped into coverage he looked confused and was second guessing everything.

I hope we have that safety from Northwestern on our radar. That guy looks legit. Queiro was his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...