Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if a team tied every game they played?


hepcat

Recommended Posts

I know it's nearly impossible for that to happen, but what if some team went 0-0-16? Now granted, there would be 13 other teams out there with tie games, and including all the teams in your division would have 2. What would a situation like that...entail?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

unlike hockey you go no points for a tie. What would it entail??

First pick in the 2010 draft!!!!

Actually, I was thinking that when determining draft status and playoff seedings, a tie counts as one, half a win and one, half a loss. So a team that would go 0-0-16 would actually be looked at as a 8-8 team. I might be completely wrong but I thought I remember reading that last year when the Eagles where trying to make the playoffs over the Cowboys.

As for what a record like that entails? I have no clue and really could care less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From everything I have read, wins count first. So a team that is 10-6 is better than one that is 9-6-1 since it is first total number of wins that matter. If 2 teams have the same number of wins, then the team with the fewer losses is seeded next.

So being 0-0-16 would put you behind everyone who had at least 1 win. You would be ahead of only teams without a win but with at least 1 loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s like being on the Flyers broadcast team feed so far
    • Boy the flyers look good early. Lots of bad plays and slow start by our team. Hope that changes before the score changes.
    • I guess I should have stipulated outside the sacred cow.   I complained from year one that Bryce should compete for and win the starting job on his own merit but no he was just handed it. I have been right there with everyone that wants competition.  But I don’t really have a huge problem with it for this season the way it has gone because where are the viable people we don’t have to trade for? I actually am okay with tiny hands Pickett because he is so close to Bryce arm strength wise and to be honest, skill wise. Probably. And it is only a one year deal.  That also takes into account that the QB class is looking stacked next year and if Young fails miserably then we get either a reset or a real competition and there will be more guys that I would like looking at in the FA QB class next year as well.    I sort of accept where we are this year and look at it as another treading water year (at QB). I just want to get to next year with some clarity. More than anything. And they did empty out the room. Again, who was really there for us?  And I know it would not be a true competition at this point anyway. They are giving him the year, like it or not.    Also I don’t give a poo about winning games IF he sucks and or goes down after sucking because draft position and that stacked QB class.  And I want out from under him So Bad.     So I guess it is several factors that lessen my anxiety over his backup this particular season.    I am not trying to convince anyone, but you asked. That’s how I look at it. 
×
×
  • Create New...