Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if a team tied every game they played?

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

I know it's nearly impossible for that to happen, but what if some team went 0-0-16? Now granted, there would be 13 other teams out there with tie games, and including all the teams in your division would have 2. What would a situation like that...entail?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mountainpantherfan Newbie

mountainpantherfan

Posted
Posted

unlike hockey you go no points for a tie. What would it entail??

First pick in the 2010 draft!!!!

Actually, I was thinking that when determining draft status and playoff seedings, a tie counts as one, half a win and one, half a loss. So a team that would go 0-0-16 would actually be looked at as a 8-8 team. I might be completely wrong but I thought I remember reading that last year when the Eagles where trying to make the playoffs over the Cowboys.

As for what a record like that entails? I have no clue and really could care less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

From everything I have read, wins count first. So a team that is 10-6 is better than one that is 9-6-1 since it is first total number of wins that matter. If 2 teams have the same number of wins, then the team with the fewer losses is seeded next.

So being 0-0-16 would put you behind everyone who had at least 1 win. You would be ahead of only teams without a win but with at least 1 loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Carolina Still Not Respected

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I think it's short sighted to judge a QB or HC in a vacuum. They both need good players to be successful. That's the GM's role. And he's young in his role too. His general experience in the league gives him a bit of an advantage/perspective that everyone doesn't have. But he still has to perfect his role as a GM.  But whether they're good or not, they are young in their roles. That is the point I was making. Could they be better at what they do? Of course. But it's hard to have early success when you have so many major areas still figuring out how to do their jobs at the same time. Asking a QB to pass for 4000 yards when neither of his 2 best WRs have played a full season is a tall task. Asking a HC to be an effective HC while he's calling plays when he's only done it for 3 years, and he has a young roster is a tall ask. Especially with a roster with so many holes and lack of talent. But that young label is definitely coming to its end. It's about time to start showing major improvements on offense, defense and coaching. Dan has had 3 drafts/offseasons to improve the roster. Dave has had 2 training camps. Bryce has had 3 seasons, though that first season was a pretty tough situation for anyone to learn, let alone have success. The QB is on the hotseat. Mostly because it's pay up or shut up time. He's ran out of time. Doesn't matter if he has reasons or not.  Not getting into the other stuff. Too many layers to pull back.   
    • jfra78
      Panthers add to coaching staff

      By jfra78 · Posted

    • Daddy_Uncle
      Panthers add to coaching staff

      By Daddy_Uncle · Posted

      Id love to see Dave Canales lay the wood hard on a guy
×
×
  • Create New...