Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical OC Interview


PantherBrew

Recommended Posts

Run to set up the pass?

Pass to set up the run?

Are you able to change those mindsets not just from game to game, but half to half?

What was wrong with the Panthers run game last year?

What have you seen from Cam Newton, that makes you think he would excel in your offense?

Do you think it's important to have a 2 minute and a 4 minute offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have two potentially dynamic playmakers on the roster with experience at both RB and WR in McCaffrey and Samuel. Tell me in detail how you plan to utilitize these guys to create match up issues for the defense. (I want to hear about looks where both line up in the backfield flanking Cam in the shotgun with a run/pass option and checks to be able to split one or both out wide depending on the defensive look)

We know we are mediocre at LT. How do you plan to help out Kalil and mitigate the rush from Cam’s blind side? (I want to hear about hard play actions not this token stuff we do so often, screen passes to that side of the field to exploit an aggressive rusher, and plays specifically designed to get Cam out of the pocket and rolling out to his RIGHT. Too often Shula would have Cam rolling to the left. Why roll toward the weak side of your OL and to the opposite hand of your QB forcing a throw across his body?)

This is super simple stuff but it’s stuff that I never saw evidence from Shula that he grasped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...