Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wilks to get second interview with Cardinals


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Camvp said:

That's the most dead end HC vacancy this year by a good bit.  He'll be back out on his ass in the not too distant future if he takes that job; they have nothing promising on the horizon.

i think taking a head coaching gig with a team that isn't expected to do much is a smart move, especially for Wilks being a first timer. Ownership will have patience with him, and the expectations and pressure to come in and succeed immediately will be pretty low. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

i think taking a head coaching gig with a team that isn't expected to do much is a smart move, especially for Wilks being a first timer. Ownership will have patience with him, and the expectations and pressure to come in and succeed immediately will be pretty low. 

Yeah, so long as he doesn't get tossed on his ass as a scapegoat if they go 2-14. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, any time you're going to a team that's changing coaches, chances are there's some retooling needed.

Positives though? Arians retired, so you're not following a firing.  And people have generally had a positive opinion of Steve Keim's performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Take him, bring back Del Rio, upgrade, profit.

Rivera has all but directly stated that if Wilks gets a new job, Eric Washington replaces him.

The only other option would be Al Holcomb if Washington followed Wilks to his new team. If something happened and both were gone, Rivera has a preference for people he knows well so you're probably looking at someone like Bob Babich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

i think taking a head coaching gig with a team that isn't expected to do much is a smart move, especially for Wilks being a first timer. Ownership will have patience with him, and the expectations and pressure to come in and succeed immediately will be pretty low. 

They have decent core to work with especially his department the secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Camvp said:

That's the most dead end HC vacancy this year by a good bit.  He'll be back out on his ass in the not too distant future if he takes that job; they have nothing promising on the horizon.

...how?

Like their offense is mostly injury prone players but they still have David Johnson, and Fitz still has some gas.

Chandler Jones, Patrick Peterson, Budda Baker,  Markus Golden, and Mathieu if he can stay healthy.

They're on the upswing and have a lot of promising and proven talent. They're a QB and some solid skill players away from being the second best team in that division.

I'd take the Cardinals job before the Colts job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Rivera has all but directly stated that if Wilks gets a new job, Eric Washington replaces him.

The only other option would be Al Holcomb if Washington followed Wilks to his new team. If something happened and both were gone, Rivera has a preference for people he knows well so you're probably looking at someone like Bob Babich.

I would love it if Rivera would give Kris Richard a look. I know it won't happen becuase Rivera, but it would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

i think taking a head coaching gig with a team that isn't expected to do much is a smart move, especially for Wilks being a first timer. Ownership will have patience with him, and the expectations and pressure to come in and succeed immediately will be pretty low. 

Bad teams rarely have patience. See the Browns, Bills, or Raiders if you want to argue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...