Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith's Take


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Boiling down a successful WR corps to "you can't have two 6'+ guys" is one of the worst generalizations I have ever seen. Anywhere. Period.

For Panthers scheme yea it doesn’t work... 

Specificity help .......

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Twin Tower doesn’t work 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I'm hoping we don't sign a WR in the first round because we added a quality a vet in free agency. 

If we do add a receiver I hope it is someone with the potential to play on the outside.  I still think the slot might be the best place for Samuel and Byrd.  Also if we draft a traditional RB (which I think we might), we might see CMC in the slot more.

What I'm hoping:

Starting outside receivers:

Funchess and Vet

Back up outside receiver: draft pick in the 2nd-4th round range

Slot receiver:  Samuel, Byrd, or CMC

Running back:  Rookie, CMC

3rd down back: CMC

Somebody will end up finding a quality receiver in the 2nd-4th round, hopefully it is us.  I'm a fan of Gallup but he might end up gong higher then I originally thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, AU-panther said:

Personally I'm hoping we don't sign a WR in the first round because we added a quality a vet in free agency. 

If we do add a receiver I hope it is someone with the potential to play on the outside.  I still think the slot might be the best place for Samuel and Byrd.  Also if we draft a traditional RB (which I think we might), we might see CMC in the slot more.

What I'm hoping:

Starting outside receivers:

Funchess and Vet

Back up outside receiver: draft pick in the 2nd-4th round range

Slot receiver:  Samuel, Byrd, or CMC

Running back:  Rookie, CMC

3rd down back: CMC

Somebody will end up finding a quality receiver in the 2nd-4th round, hopefully it is us.  I'm a fan of Gallup but he might end up gong higher then I originally thought.

I'm really curious to see what Norv does with this offense and some of the jack of all trades weapons we have.  One of the looks I really wanted to see us throw at defenses was Cam in the shotgun flanked with CMC and Samuel. You'd essentially have two guys back there who are RB/WR hybrids. Either could take a handoff, either could be threats out of the backfield as receivers, either or both could be motioned out wide. It would put a lot of pressure on a defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...