Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm sure its BS but....


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

The ESPN insider is headlining with the possibility that Peppers could get traded to the Patriots. I don't have insider and I realize that the Panthers have had a ton of "rumors" on here that never came true but I was wondering what it said. I'd hope that any deal that gets done is better than a 2nd or 3rd rounder, it should be interesting leading up to the 20th. My gut says nothing happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ESPN insider is headlining with the possibility that Peppers could get traded to the Patriots. I don't have insider and I realize that the Panthers have had a ton of "rumors" on here that never came true but I was wondering what it said. I'd hope that any deal that gets done is better than a 2nd or 3rd rounder, it should be interesting leading up to the 20th. My gut says nothing happens.

De ja vu all over again.:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been rumors flying about the New England Patriots possibly trading for Julius Peppers since the beginning of the offseason and they've persisted in spite of repeated debunkings.

Although it's a hypothetical, NFL Insider Adam Schefter has also brought up the San Francisco 49ers as a possible destination for Peppers, should the Carolina Panthers elect to trade him.

A trade to the Niners would be particularly ironic, as it would likely involve a 2010 first-round pick, and the Niners currently own the Panthers' 2010 first-rounder. In exchange for that pick, the Panthers got the Niners' second-round pick in April, which they used on defensive end Everette Brown, who is still learning at the altar of Peppers. It's the circle of life in the NFL, folks.

:Yawn:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who wants a 16mil dollar DE that tries to play about every 2nd or 3rd game?

People made similar comments about Moss before he resurrected his career in New England. While I don't think we've kept Peppers from succeeding, as the Raiders did with Moss, I wouldn't be surprised if Peppers was a dominant force in New England. A change of scenery can do wonders (see Braylon Edwards to the Jets just a week ago).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People made similar comments about Moss before he resurrected his career in New England. While I don't think we've kept Peppers from succeeding, as the Raiders did with Moss, I wouldn't be surprised if Peppers was a dominant force in New England. A change of scenery can do wonders (see Braylon Edwards to the Jets just a week ago).

I agree but from the looks of what was posted on the insider it doesn't really seem like there is much of a story here. I honestly think that some of these reports just throw everything out there in hopes of something being right at some point. As much as people talk badly about Peppers I really doubt we'd be better off without him at this point. After the season is a different story but not now. As much as I like Johnson I think he is better suited playing opposite Peppers and Brayton is better at stopping the run. Brown could potentially replace him but he isn't going to make the same kind of plays right now or at any point this season.

I do like Brown's motor though, he is the kind of guy that I wish are team was filled with. The Smitty's, Beasons, Davis', and Brown's are too few and far between on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the best way I can describe ESPN. ESPN reporters are like "psychics" that prey on old ladies whose only income is their dead husband's pension and social security. They tell these old ladies 15 different forms of bullshit, hoping that just one will stick, thus giving them credibility, and then it will keep the old ladies coming back.

"You will unexpectedly come into a lot of money."

"Oh my god, I found a $5 bill in my purse! She was right!"

That is the essence of ESPN "journalism". Throw 100 bullshit rumors at the wall and pray to god one of them sticks. 99% of them have no foundation, and are just people like Schefter and Mort saying to themselves, "Hmm, who has a 1st rounder to give up and could use a 6' 6" 287 lb. super athletic defensive end?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...