Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Developing Trade pending with Raiders

Biggdaddi1022

By Biggdaddi1022,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Riv Newbie

Riv

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ericr0319 said:

funchess would start for most teams. 

PFF has him as the 44th best WR.... that means he shouldn't be the #1 option on any team and is halfway to being not even a #2 starter on any team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCO96 Veteran

SCO96

Posted
Posted

Crabtree's stats for last year. 58 receptions, 618yds, 8 TD's. That averages to just over 10.7 yds per catch. He'll turn 31 on 09/15/2018. If someone offers the Raiders a similar offer, do you guys think he's worth a 5th round pick?

I think if I were GM I'd strongly consider it. He's got two years left on his deal. He's experienced and would likely contribute from day 1. I can't see a 5th round pick being as valuable to the team as Crabtree would be over the next two seasons. In fact it's possible that a 5th rounder may not even make the team this season depending on other siginings and the UDFA's. We'd owe him $15,968,750 over the next two seasons (unless the deal was renegotiated). That's a lot less than the other WR's are making in the 2018 FA class.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Riv said:

lol, please tell me you are joking.  How many other teams would Funchess actually start for, let alone be the #1 option?

Funch is a good player and we are lucky to have him. He would start for a lot of teams in the NFL. 

What are you, 14?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riv Newbie

Riv

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, 4Corners said:

Funch is a good player and we are lucky to have him. He would start for a lot of teams in the NFL. 

What are you, 14?

He's average and based on his PFF ranking, he would start for approximately 20 teams as a #2.  Come up with some facts to back up what you say...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riv Newbie

Riv

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

Crabtree's stats for last year. 58 receptions, 618yds, 8 TD's. That averages to just over 10.7 yds per catch. He'll turn 31 on 09/15/2018. If someone offers the Raiders a similar offer, do you guys think he's worth a 5th round pick?

I think if I were GM I'd strongly consider it. He's got two years left on his deal. He's experienced and would likely contribute from day 1. I can't see a 5th round pick being as valuable to the team as Crabtree would be over the next two seasons. In fact it's possible that a 5th rounder may not even make the team this season depending on other siginings and the UDFA's. We'd owe him $15,968,750 over the next two seasons (unless the deal was renegotiated). That's a lot less than the other WR's are making in the 2018 FA class.

Thoughts?

I mean, he instantly becomes our best receiver... since Smitty left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • TD alt
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By TD alt · Posted

      I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...