Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Hughes


ericr0319

Recommended Posts

 

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

24 is too rich for Hughes though. I wouldn’t mind using Norwell’s third next year to move up in the 2nd to grab him after someone else at 24. 

I've seen him as high as the second CB on some list.  The only constant among the top group of CBs is that Ward is usually the first.  I wouldn't be surprised at all if 5 CBs go in the first round.

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We don't have a CB on the roster signed past 2019. I have no problem going CB early. Even at #24.

CB and DE are two positions that I don't think you can have too many of with the way todays game is.  The positions are too important, too expensive, and too hard to find.

Also what does everyone think about changing our philosophy some with our CBs?  We seam to go cheap because we rely on our zone.  Maybe we need to be able to press a little more.  I think 2015 gave us a false sense of how good our defense could be because of the abnormally high number of turnovers we got.

Last year we tried to blitz more but that didn't always work well.  Seems like we need the ability to press a little more.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asante Samuel was 5'10" (and probably shorter) when he came out of UCF, and I'd love Samuel in his prime. I really just found this interesting because I posted my best friend was waiting on the Panthers and Hughes during this meeting and gave me the inside scoop. lol. That said, I would love another CB on this team. He won't be matched on the #1 WR anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd definitely rather have Jackson or Oliver if we go CB at 24.

Jackson completely. Oliver, i'd take either or. I am a tad bias with UCF and FSU being my alma maters. I would love Hughes in the 1st and Sweat in the 2nd. :shades:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see him wrap up but on a couple of tackles out of all 3 videos, instead going for the big knock down hit or taking the legs out from under the runner almost every time.  Sometimes it worked, but sometimes the runner was able to keep his balance and gain several more yards.   We've seen too much of that the past few seasons.  I'd rather have someone that is equally as good or better in coverage but can also tackle better.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we have everyone playing like they should, we can win the Cup. That has been the biggest problem when we get to the playoffs, but this year seems to be fixed mostly. We could have had multiple if we had done this in the past.
    • Here we go Bryce Stan’s you should love this. Hell it may be one of you.  It has every cliche excuse and then some.  Unintentionally hilarious my limit was reached when he said Bryce had it hard because four play callers. 
    • Luke goes in to the specifics of what he looked to accomplish in joint practices.  Basically they may work with someone on the opposing team to stress something they feel is a weakness in their own game in a different way that can be done with someone they are familiar with. That they can have predetermined stresses but since neither wants to get injured and it has absolutely no bearing on anything there is not the level of concern that would be in a preseason game.  He would also even chat with opposing OC.   It seems like an interesting nuance among the vets and savy pros.    
×
×
  • Create New...