Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another scandal on Mint Street???


Cookie Lyon

Recommended Posts

Just now, vorbis said:

not good enough

It doesn't have to be good enough for you. Everyone has a right to their opinion as long as it is presently civilly. I am just wondering what you expected to happen. If you want sympathy and outrage appear on the View. On a football forum this was actually.pretty tame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

I can understand why she’s being hostile. If I was a woman on this board, I’d be hostile as well. Also, when feeling ignored and feeling like the issues that you’re bringing forth aren’t being taken seriously, I can understand how that would breed hostility as well.

Just because you understand it doesn't mean it's going to help her reach other people who are less forgiving. If you want your thread and beliefs to be taken seriously you need to keep it together and have a real discussion. I understand her frustration as well but I'm not going to try to have a real discussion with someone who refuses to play nice. That's lunacy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dex said:

I'm not saying the Huddle doesn't have its trolls and jackassess but I don't believe it's a large group of contributors.  Like I said they just shout louder for attention.

it's a significant portion of the regular posters as evidenced by almost every remotely political thread on the main board getting torpedoed into the tinderbox (Kaep, Greg Hardy DV in 2014, Michael Bennett).

there's a reason the vast majority of this forums contributors are men, and its not just because NFL fans are majority male.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dex said:

I'm not saying the Huddle doesn't have its trolls and jackassess but I don't believe it's a large group of contributors.  Like I said they just shout louder for attention.

then maybe us contributors who aren't trolls and jackasses should take on some of the burden of calling out the bull**** for what it is, instead of leaving it to the one or two self-identified women in this thread to deal with. again.

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I think someone said in this thread "know you audience" and calling your audience "idiots" will not work in your favor. Most likely the catalyst of escalation. 

the catalyst of escalation was that a woman posted an opinion that had the slightest tinge of controversy in a forum where so many male posters can't handle that sort of thing. it was escalated long before she used the word 'idiot'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

It doesn't have to be good enough for you. Everyone has a right to their opinion as long as it is presently civilly. I am just wondering what you expected to happen. If you want sympathy and outrage appear on the View. On a football forum this was actually.pretty tame

not. good. enough. surely you are capable of better than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vorbis said:

then maybe us contributors who aren't trolls and jackasses should take on some of the burden of calling out the bull**** for what it is, instead of leaving it to the one or two self-identified women in this thread to deal with. again.

the catalyst of escalation was that a woman posted an opinion that had the slightest tinge of controversy in a forum where so many male posters can't handle that sort of thing. it was escalated long before she used the word 'idiot'.

Thank you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cookie Lyon said:

I was attacking the idiots who didn't come in here to have a civilized discussion. Have you any read this thread? Your post on the first page is ridiculous as well.

My initial post was in response to your sensationalist headline and bolded statement. My true feelings on the subject have been realized and I apologize if you found my OP ridiculous or condescending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, vorbis said:

then maybe us contributors who aren't trolls and jackasses should take on some of the burden of calling out the bull**** for what it is, instead of leaving it to the one or two self-identified women in this thread to deal with. again.

the catalyst of escalation was that a woman posted an opinion that had the slightest tinge of controversy in a forum where so many male posters can't handle that sort of thing. it was escalated long before she used the word 'idiot'.

I am assuming you read my original comment? Are you stating that you believe the OP replied correctly to me on a equal sided acknowledgment that did not indicate any type of social injustice or workplace inequality?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vorbis said:

then maybe us contributors who aren't trolls and jackasses should take on some of the burden of calling out the bull**** for what it is, instead of leaving it to the one or two self-identified women in this thread to deal with. again.

the catalyst of escalation was that a woman posted an opinion that had the slightest tinge of controversy in a forum where so many male posters can't handle that sort of thing. it was escalated long before she used the word 'idiot'.

It's not my responsibility to white knight and argue for people who cant hold their own. I am here to give my opinion. But sure...

 

 

I HEREBY CONDEMN ALL SEXISTS, RACISTS AND TRUMP SUPPORTERS. SHOW SOME RESPECT OR GTFO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...