Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Tale of Two CBs: Cockrell and Bradberry


MHS831

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Devil Doc said:

I really dont know what my Major is... and I have 3 classes to finish my Bachelors... lol. 

Then you have about 2 semesters left, according to my math and my history.  Congrats by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Then you have about 2 semesters left, according to my math and my history.  Congrats by the way.

Lol, I hope not. I have 1 Class in the Summer, and 2 Courses in the Fall and I'm done. I actually know what my major is, but it is one of them ones that is hard to explain to people. Thanks, I only take 1 course, every 8 weeks, while working full time. It has taken me close to 8 years to get a Bachelors... gotta start somewhere right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(40 - 25.3)/25.3 = 58.1% increase, that is a lot more pressure on DBs. 

2016 team sack total 47

2017 team sack total 50

(50 - 47)/47= 6.38% increase of sacks

 

The blitzing did not significantly increase sacks to justify opening up our backend to big plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SetfreexX said:

You'd think the fan base would be a bit more excited about our top three DBs right now....

Brabdberry / Cockrell / Munnerlyn

We are legit at all three positions, Searcy and Adams rotating at Safety with a rookie day 1/2 selection gives us one of our better secondaries in recent years. 

Paired with what has the potential to be a better pass rush with the addition of Poe, Butler seeing more time, as well as Hall making his debut after a red-shirt season, and other guys like Horton who's been better each year. I think there's a reason for some cautious optimism. We really don't ''need'' to draft a defensive back this season. 

Gunter / Seymour / Elder / Luke are all depth that I think most of us like.

We do need  a stud safety for sure...but the off season moves at CB give us some flexibility in the draft...we could very well look at Corn as our new draft pick and concentrate on other positions unless a CB falls to us that we couldn't turn down... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I don't know that we need defensive pieces as much as more offensive weapons. By our pick at 24 we know the best DEs will be off the board. Maybe the best corners or safety may be gone as well. So is the better value the 3rd or 4th best corner or safety or the best TE or the best guard. Obviously the 5th best safety might be tops on our board making it a no brainer. Or we can find equivalent talent as one position later on in the draft but not at another. Still when I read talking about our biggest needs and drafting purely for need, it makes me pretty concerned about reaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Honestly I don't know that we need defensive pieces as much as more offensive weapons. By our pick at 24 we know the best DEs will be off the board. Maybe the best corners or safety may be gone as well. So is the better value the 3rd or 4th best corner or safety or the best TE or the best guard. Obviously the 5th best safety might be tops on our board making it a no brainer. Or we can find equivalent talent as one position later on in the draft but not at another. Still when I read talking about our biggest needs and drafting purely for need, it makes me pretty concerned about reaching.

I think the off season moves have helped to the point we dont have to reach...with tge amount of talent worthy of the first rd I see us with a good chance to get what we need in a BPA capacity...WR...DE...CB...SAFETY...OL are all in play ,which is a great position to be in...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Honestly I don't know that we need defensive pieces as much as more offensive weapons. By our pick at 24 we know the best DEs will be off the board. Maybe the best corners or safety may be gone as well. So is the better value the 3rd or 4th best corner or safety or the best TE or the best guard. Obviously the 5th best safety might be tops on our board making it a no brainer. Or we can find equivalent talent as one position later on in the draft but not at another. Still when I read talking about our biggest needs and drafting purely for need, it makes me pretty concerned about reaching.

We need a FS and DE class is weak, I concur that this draft maybe primarily an offensive leaning one.

I can see DJ Moore in the first, Hurst in the 2nd, Bates III and Penny in the 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ecu88 said:

We need a FS and DE class is weak, I concur that this draft maybe primarily an offensive leaning one.

I can see DJ Moore in the first, Hurst in the 2nd, Bates III and Penny in the 3rd.

That would be a nice haul...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting better players is usually the best formula for success.  However, another pathway is mentality.  Since Norman’s release we have lost the “theives ave” attitude.  We may not have or be able to acquire a playmaker in the secondary, but RR must allow them to take more chances and create more turnovers.  If all you are required to do is bend, bend, bend you lose your aggressiveness. The secondary needs to come together as a unit and develop it’s own personality that can feed off of one another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...