Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would it take for you to trade Greg Olsen to the cowboys?

Panthero

By Panthero,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, sharkkiller said:

Can you be more specific? What about the roster has you feeling this way? This team has improved over last year's team which won 11 games.

I think our o-line and db' s are worse. I think the guys we drafted are good but won't be impactful (other than dj moore) until after their rookie year. I do like the moves though. Just won' have a big impact until their sophomore year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

Not hateful.

You don't get rid of cams most reliable receiving threat.

So that makes this thread just as bad as most of your other posts.

That hurts me in my heart man. 

If I thought we could win it all this year then keep him. I happen to not think we can. Too many weaknesses at vital positions. I guess you go for it, but seems we could fleece the cowboys on that trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

LT: Smith or RB Elliot 

Dam, that's there 2 best players probably.  Anyway, don't want to trade Olsen but definitely hoping for a full season from him.  Another injury would really sug.

If I had to trade him I would want a first for sure.  That would leave us in bind at the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trucpfan Mentor

trucpfan

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

You'd make a hell of an NFL Gm dude.  You should go for it.

Or shock jock it's a thing say something crazy get a big reaction before you know it you'll get enough attention to say more random baseless statements which can lead to more attention good or bad people love attention.

35 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

As long as the Cowboys take you, they can Olsen without the picks.

Hahahahahaha this is a hilarious thread for real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Panthero said:

I say a first and third. They have to have one. We aren't Superbowl competitive this year. Is shopping him to them worth it? What would be your price if this isn' rich enough?

put the Madden down

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
  • Author
Posted
31 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

Or shock jock it's a thing say something crazy get a big reaction before you know it you'll get enough attention to say more random baseless statements which can lead to more attention good or bad people love attention.

Hahahahahaha this is a hilarious thread for real.

That wasn' my intention. Maybe you are looking for poo to overreact to when it' posted by the infrequent posters. 

Shock jock. Lol. fuging ridiculous comment. It's a curveball I thought was worth putting oiut there. All I get is negative bullshit attacks. How about just answering the question instead of trying to demean the person that wrote it. Maybe youre not capable of that. Not my problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

They lost one TE to broadcasting and they'll now trade for another TE who's old, injuries are catching up and toying with broadcasting as well.... You'd be lucky to get a seventh for him

Maybe. But maybe they think they are a tight end away from a super bowl. That's a team you can fleece. Doubt they are closer than we are, but that doesn' t mean they know it. 

We have to rebuild eventually. We can either do it slowly or painfully. Greg is a huge part of the offense but he' gone within 2 years. Seems like it would be nice to get something for him. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      2026 World Cup Thread

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • TD alt
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • rebelrouser
      LWOS on the FO's error--my word--on X...traits, timelines, Brazzell, & indications of improvement.

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...