Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is having a #1 WR overrated in the modern NFL?


kungfoodude

Recommended Posts

The search for a #1 WR has been a hot topic amongst Panthers fans since Steve Smith left the franchise. Dak Prescott weighed in recently in an interview and said,

Quote

"I don't know if any team in the league necessarily needs a No. 1 receiver," Prescott said via Pro Football Talk. "It's about getting the ball out, spreading the ball around, keeping the defense on its toes."

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/dak-prescott-i-dont-know-if-any-team-in-the-league-necessarily-needs-a-no-1-receiver/

The article goes on to present some examples on either side of the argument, including a blurb that mentions us as an example.

Quote

Fair enough, but having a go-to guy -- whether it's Dez Bryant or even tight end Jason Witten -- forces opponents to adjust how they defend you. Having a bunch of players who are considered second and third options makes life considerably easier on that defense.

Put another way: The Steelers without Antonio Brown are a completely different offense; same for the Texans and DeAndre Hopkins and the Falcons and Julio Jones.

The counterargument would be the 2017 Panthers; their leading receiver was running back Christian McCaffrey (80 catches) followed by wideout Devin Funchess (63) and then Kelvin Benjamin (51), who was traded midway through the season.

Admittedly, I don't think we were a great example of the point Dak is trying to make because of our previous OC and also the pile of hot garbage we had at WR for most of the season. The Patriots are a much more classic example of a true #1 WR being overrated, IMO. I tend to agree with what Prescott is saying. The trend seems to be towards having multiple pass receiving threats at wideout, TE and RB. 

Thoughts? Would you rather have an Antonio Brown/Julio Jones type #1 WR(and the expense they incur) or a stable of average to good receiving threats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've heard more than one analyst say that receivers are following the same trend of being devalued as runningbacks have been.

It hasn't hit that point yet because you still see large contracts being handed out to guys like Landry, Watkins, Robinson, Richardson, Lee, Wilson and Moncrief. I will be curious to see if it trends in that direction long term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better to have an elite OL than a single elite WR. A decent OL and a group of #2 and 3 receivers plus a power back that can bulldoze in short yard situations is what I feel is all your offense truly needs other than a top 10 qb.

Have a OC who doesn’t have spaghetti for brains helps too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've heard more than one analyst say that receivers are following the same trend of being devalued as runningbacks have been.

I was about to post this exact thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

It hasn't hit that point yet because you still see large contracts being handed out to guys like Landry, Watkins, Robinson, Richardson, Lee, Wilson and Moncrief. I will be curious to see if it trends in that direction long term. 

But only two were taken in the first round this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've heard more than one analyst say that receivers are following the same trend of being devalued as runningbacks have been.

I think those analysts are morons to put it quite bluntly. Career JAG WRs we’re getting $8M+ per year in free agency this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Asurfaholic said:

Better to have an elite OL than a single elite WR. A decent OL and a group of #2 and 3 receivers plus a power back that can bulldoze in short yard situations is what I feel is all your offense truly needs other than a top 10 qb.

Have a OC who doesn’t have spaghetti for brains helps too.

This. You see it time and time again. It’s more about spreading the ball out and utilizing specialities (etc speed to stretch the field). It’s about having an array of tools. 

However #1 elite receivers are a must...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Madden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I think those analysts are morons to put it quite bluntly. Career JAG WRs we’re getting $8M+ per year in free agency this year.

To the point that teams would rather pay someone with some experience, even if they're not that great, than draft an unknown with a high pick.

It's the kind of thing that affects rookies more than vets.  If you've proven you can play in the league, you have more value no matter the position.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've heard more than one analyst say that receivers are following the same trend of being devalued as runningbacks have been.

I don't agree though.

RBs value has dropped due to NFL rules designed to increase the ability for offense to score in games (something of which Ron Rivera ignores and, when he deigns to recognize it, HATES).

These same rules increase the value of the TRUE #1 receiver.

However (and there's always a however), a TRUE #1 isn't just picked off of the receiver tree.

A true #1 in today's NFL has to have the strength to fight off the press (and hand-fighting). the deep speed to get open down-field (WRs that specialize in the 5-10 yd catch are NOT "#1's"), and the skill to run sharp routes.

And, as I said above, those guys don't grow on trees.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Big opportunity for Nadeau if he gets called up. 
    • I think OL is a pretty low overall concern but every single offseason there should be an attempt to upgrade through the draft. Edge rusher there are no easy answers, IMO. If a truly elite prospect falls to us in the 1st, that is fine. This draft seems to be much more heavy on 3-4 DE's or 4-3 DE's than it is on elite EDGE guys. You just have to keep plugging away every offseason and hope it works out. I don't think it's worth trading a ton of draft capital over at the moment, despite being a crucial roster weakness. Do the best you can and build a better roster and maybe eventually we will be in a position to be making a Parsons level trade.
    • I understand that a capable OC is desirable but I also understand, or think I might, the dynamics with the staff and maybe I’m wrong but I do not see Canales firing his offensive right hand guy without significant pressure from Morgan or Tepper to do so.  So that, in addition to Canales stating pretty definitively, that he was keeping play calling.     I don’t know what you do in that circumstance. It would need to be important enough to you to make it worth firing Canales to get your OC play caller.    To that, if Canales not being good so far at play calling (and we only have the one year in TB to factor with what we have see here), is accepted as a given, it is only fair and honest to consider what an impediment having to construct and administer an offense around Bryce Young’s game would be to an OC. I would say it is a big complication, big surprise there.  You won’t know about Canales 100% until you remove Bryce from the equation and get him a clean slate to create from - without the Bryce restrictions.  And yeah you will likely end up without a top notch high flying offense. But it still *could* be much better than it is now. In the right hands.  So that is potentially what we’re looking at. I suppose we could keep Bryce and bring in a college style coach and design a Bryce rollout offense or something and see if that helped. I am not in favor of that, probably the last thing I would want.  We could do nothing, which I am not in favor of. We could fire Canales and keep Bryce (my least preferred option). We could get rid of both, which I would begrudgingly accept but would lament the interruption of the continuity that a 3rd year would provide.  You could get rid of Bryce and get a couple of new QB prospects in here, vets, drafts, whatever… that would be my choice.  I am afraid I know how it’s gonna go. All I can really say about that is, there has not been a single time in three years that I looked at the upcoming game and felt like we were gonna win because we have Bryce Young playing QB. Because of what he could do with the ball in his hands. Not once. Sure there have been a handful of games that he was part of the reason we won, a couple he was a big part, but not enough times to feel like that is my expectation. At best, it is cross your fingers and hope for good Bryce. 
×
×
  • Create New...