Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's a boy!!!!!!!!


GRWatcher

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Harbingers said:

The question is more, please enlighten me on why they have to be married to have children.

Would love to hear the responses when their children ask them why mommy and daddy aren’t married. Because you know it’s coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/8/2018 at 2:32 PM, Harbingers said:

The question is more, please enlighten me on why they have to be married to have children.

They don't have to be married to have kids. Personally, I don't understand why you wouldn't unless you were married or in a long term committed relationship. I couldn't go through not being able to see my kids every night if I had to live separately by choice but that's just me. Being married doesn't make you a better parent. There's a lot of people who stay married "for the kids" who don't see how much their dysfunctional relationships are actually hurting them. As long as he's an active father in his children's lives, hats off too him. We have way to many kids growing up today without their fathers in any form. 

Could tell him to keep pounding, but he seems to already have that part down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • fans view “box safety” with the same disdain they have when they hear “game manager” QB.   but there’s a reason most 1st round safeties are “box safeties”-it’s a much longer list of requisite skills to be a good box safety than it is to be a guy whose only real responsibility is to not get beat over the top. Fans crave the ed reed type and as someone who has never been able to enjoy this franchise having a guy like that, I get the enthusiasm-but I’m not really prepared to spend a first round pick on a free safety. If it happens it’ll be fun, it’ll address a need with a good player and that’s well and good. But those guys end up walking after their first contract because their pedigree usually outpaces what their teams feel like they’re adding to their overall win total.
    • Its criminal that the upcoming season is mainly in the tiny hands of BY.  I still member the time I did a full turn, if you member his first off-season from that Panthers all-time worst team....... Answering questions at his first presser, he goes along the lines " I didn't do nothing, no weight room or throwing" " I needed to get away". I was fully out with him, the guy didn't even try to improve his football mind, body, strength, in the biggest joke of panther football. I could not believe it, what a leader or dare say "point guard"(lols @ NBA point guards as a ref)
    • I view FS almost as the NT of the secondary. Oftentimes the true measure of his impact isn't necessarily in the plays that he makes but what he allows you to do with the rest of your defense to allow them to make plays. When you have that elite true sideline to sideline FS safety blanket over the top of the defense it allows you to be a lot more aggressive with everyone else. Where as when you have a Nick Scott as your last line of defense you gotta be mindful to not have to rely too heavily on that.
×
×
  • Create New...