Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Daeshon Hall


panther4life

Recommended Posts

I went back and watched the 2nd string defensive lines in both preseason games. Hall has been extremely underwhelming even against 2nd/3rd string o-lineman. His effort looks like crap, blocked out of a run play by a tight end and gave hardly any fight. Then on the final Miami TD we dropped him in coverage. He was staring  Bryce Petty down head on as he scrambled ahead for the TD but a quick fake to the right juked him right out of the play.

Based on the rotation in the first 2 games, I'd say all of these ends are ahead of him on the current depth chart.

Haynes,Obada, and Zach Moore.  Thats 6 total ahead of him when you include Pep,Mario and Horton.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Haynes has looked just as good as Obada as this point. Did you mean Hall? I think its a strong possibility he doesn't make it.

yes I meant hall, apologies, Haynes looks like hes got speed, probably still better suited to be in the 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The crazy thing is, if Hall goes in the next game and has a sack people will be saying what a great depth guy he is.

Hall is doing just fine as far as disrupting the QB, he could do a little better at setting the edge in the run game but I think he'll make the 53. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously guys, I'm not trying to be funny, but this is another case where I don't know what you're looking at. Hall is still learning, sure, but he is getting some pressure which in turn allows others to do their thing. Much too early for this kind of talk based upon the evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Seriously guys, I'm not trying to be funny, but this is another case where I don't know what you're looking at. Hall is still learning, sure, but he is getting some pressure which in turn allows others to do their thing. Much too early for this kind of talk based upon the evidence.

I saw the same thing you did.. And I guess ppl really don't understand it takes at least 3 years for a Dlinemen to reach his potential.. And Hall lost a full season.. This is way to early to have a opinion on him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Seriously guys, I'm not trying to be funny, but this is another case where I don't know what you're looking at. Hall is still learning, sure, but he is getting some pressure which in turn allows others to do their thing. Much too early for this kind of talk based upon the evidence.

It's the yearly preseason where people overrate/underrate depth players game-to-game. There another thread talking about how Jermaine Carter might already be our 4th best LB lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we don't go OT, we will regret it.  What bothers me?  Are we going to get a starting-caliber OT at 19?  I think the draft is solid at OT, and the more I read up and watch video, the more I watch Lomu, the more I want him.   I see Freeling as a RT who needs some work in run blocking (since we need to run first, maybe not a good fit) and I see Proctor ending up as a Guard.  After Lomu (assuming Mouigia and fanu are gone), I think we wait until round 2.  In round 2, there are about 3-4 I like (Zuhn--good pass blocker and VERY underrated right now; Tiernan is a very good pass blocker as is Miller from Clemson, but both are not good in the run game.  Max Ixxxxx from Ariz St is impressive too---technically, there is not a of difference in these second tier guys--good in pass pro, need work in the run game.   If we wait until round 2 for an OT, we probably need to sign Nijman and start him early.   I almost think this is what we should do if Lomu is gone.  There is a big dropoff after him, imo, and I think we'd get better value if a stud ILB or edge is there.  Someone like TJ Parker Clemson makes sense. If Lomu is gone, trading back might be the play.  
    • And what is x gunna help with except show him what not to do. Plus for the first year and a half he was just an obstacle 
    • I understand that some people want WR. I am solidly against using yet another high pick there. Coker is pretty good and we used No picks on him.  What I think we really need at WR is a little bit of a Smitty lite. It is ridiculous to say let’s get a Smitty because you just can’t do that, but someone not tall and long striding but more in his mold. I think we’d have a pretty well rounded group.    Looking at tackle, with replacing Moton looming, it just seems like the no brainer.  You fill in Icky short term. Depending on how he recovers, and how the new guy plays, you go from there. A tackle at 19 is most likely either a LOT, a ROT, or a big talented guard, at worst. We will need all three in the next couple of years.  I would love to have a stud ILB be there at 19 but the OL is the responsible thing to do I believe. 
×
×
  • Create New...