Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sirles to I.R, does Robinson start at RT week 1?


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Can’t believe they decided to send Sirles to Injured reserve with a hamstring injury.

Moton looks like the starter at LT while Kalil is out. Williams and Robinson who we just traded for are the only othe tackles on the roster. 

Any chance Williams is ready to go week 1? If not Robinson has to start right? 

On the bright side he must be better than Clausell and Bisnowoty, however that isn’t saying much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robinson has a history of foot injuries--and he hurt his foot Thursday night vs Cleveland.  Hope Marty did his homework.  We don't need 4 Tackles on IR  (Williams, Kalil, Sirles...) 

Not serious.  Kalil fans headed to SC for some bottle rockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Robinson has a history of foot injuries--and he hurt his foot Thursday night vs Cleveland.  Hope Marty did his homework.  We don't need 4 Tackles on IR  (Williams, Kalil, Sirles...) 

Not serious.  Kalil fans headed to SC for some bottle rockets.

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This is insane. We have two tackles currently healthy on the team, one was just  picked up an hour ago........can you imagine if Moton gets hurt game one?????

Yeah, this is a real concern.  Despite people wanting some sort of savior to come from cuts or a trade, the chances of anyone giving up a serviceable OT at this point is very small.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Woodie said:

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

That part doesn't bother me.

21 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

This is insane. We have two tackles currently healthy on the team, one was just  picked up an hour ago........can you imagine if Moton gets hurt game one?????

That does.

We're thinner than an anorexic supermodel right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Woodie said:

It was a very low risk deal.  The condition for the 7th is likely based on him playing a certain number of games.  So, if his foot continues to be a problem, we'll likely let him go and not owe anything.

True. But in the meantime we still need a healthy RT for week 1. For now Robinson is the guy. He'd better be 100%.

And who's behind Moton and Robinson?!

Wonder if there's still a chance that Williams or Matt will be sent to short-term IR to free up a spot to bring in someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KB_fan said:

True. But in the meantime we still need a healthy RT for week 1.

Wonder if there's still a chance that Williams or Matt will be sent to short-term IR to free up a spot to bring in someone else.

Word that they're not gonna IR Williams. Don't think it was ever an option for Kalil.

Barring another move, this is what we got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...