Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those of you down on Luke's performance..


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Luke has a bad game here and there. It happens, and usually for the same reason. When the defense is playing like poo, he spreads himself too thin trying to compensate for it. I feel like this was the case on Sunday. When the defense is lazy, as Ron Rivera puts it, Luke tries to do too much. The result is him not looking like the best defensive player in the league, which he still is.

Luke looked tremendous in the 1st quarter but, as the game kept deteriorating, so did his performance.

Its almost as if football is a team game.  Its hard to be perfect or near-perfect when surrounded by the chaos of mediocrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's consider the following extenuating circumstances:

Luke had 8 tackles, on 63 snaps (and that's a "bad day" for him?)

Maybe some fault lies on the other 2 LBs, Thompson and Mayo, who were in on 2 each.  Makes me think Luke might have found himself slightly out of position, taking angles to  cover his mates' deficiencies.

Granted, it wasn't his "best day" because on those, he makes 10-12 tackles.  I say we cut the man some slack, and fully expect that he'll dominate against the Bengals.  He has the competitive fire that compels him to redeem himself (he owned his mistakes in post-game comments, didn't point any fingers), and whomever draws the unlucky straw of being his next opponent will have to accept the consequences.

(and derailing the thread to compare him to Mack is irrelevant, much as comparing a QB to a RB would be).

We are SOOO fortunate to have Cam and Luke -- two of the finest and most entertaining talents of our generation -- to root for, and marvel at, every game.  (and I go back to watching Jim Brown, Ray Nitschke, and Johnny Unitas, just to name a few)  You don't have to be a blind homer to appreciate great talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol at people trashing Thomas Davis. Lol now at quite a few wanting him back after trashing him,..

football is a team sport and people have great and bad games often by what’s going on with the TEAM,..

the lack of understanding of it I blame on fantasy football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mjligon said:

Lol y’all Luke stans upset. Mack can be better than Luke, its not really a slight against Luke...Mack is the DPOTY right now and it isn’t close

Yeah where was Mack last year for the Raiders that's right nowhere to be found. Luke has never gone missing for a whole damn year. One game, all great players have that not a whole damn year go on with ur stupid poo!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the premise. I'd add that I don't think our defensive tackles (including the starters) had that great a game, which directly affects Kuechly.

Hope both of these things are an anomaly. Defense is the one thing we've always been able to depend on even when Shula was running the offense. I don't want to see a situation where we finally replace Shula only to watch the defense tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, NorvGeniusTurner said:

They’re just as dumb as the people down on Cam for hitting the check down. When he’s the only guy open

How you criticize a quarterback for hitting an open receiver, even for a short gain, boggles my mind.

For the first time in years, I feel like Newton is taking what the defense gives him rather than pressing for a big play all the time. Some would say "Why didn't he do that before?" My question would be why wasn't he taught to do that before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mjligon said:

Kalil Mack is laughing at this.

While I believe Mack is a once in a generation kind of talent, that Defense in a Chicago is waaaaaay more well rounded than ours. Can’t believe how much talent they have. I want nothing to do with them come playoff time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

No GM in the league would trade Kuechly for Mack straight up. You crazy.

Goes both ways though.  I love Luke and side with him, but I don't think anyone would give up Mack for Luke either.  Two generational talents.  We should continue to sit back and watch in awe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

While I believe Mack is a once in a generation kind of talent, that Defense in a Chicago is waaaaaay more well rounded than ours. Can’t believe how much talent they have. I want nothing to do with them come playoff time.

NFC might be too stout to have 3 teams from one division this year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...