Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Irvin vs Steve Smith Sr. | Receiving Attention


beastson

Recommended Posts

89 getting soft in his old age 

Irvin excusing it by saying he meant 89 wasn’t the type WR that QBs just lobbed up 50/50 balls too.  Yeah, he was a great route running  WR but he made guys like Jake Delhomme relevant because the 50/50 balls despite his height disadvantage was a YUGE part of his game.  

His jump ball highlight reel can compete with any big man.  89’s YAC, physical nature and the fact he could go up despite his size were literally his signatures. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

89 getting soft in his old age 

Irvin excusing it by saying he meant 89 wasn’t the type WR that QBs just lobbed up 50/50 balls too.  Yeah, he was a great route running  WR but he made guys like Jake Delhomme relevant because the 50/50 balls despite his height disadvantage was a YUGE part of his game.  

His jump ball highlight reel can compete with any big man.  89’s YAC, physical nature and the fact he could go up despite his size were literally his signatures. 

Yeah; Steve definitely let him slide on that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, I've said it before, multiple times.

Take Smitty away from the QBs he had here and put him on the Colts during the same era with Manning, in place of Marvin Harrison, and there's no doubt Smitty is at least second WR all time in yardage and every other stat if not first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for Smitty. He's growing as a person, and was the bigger man in this case. He doesn't have anything to prove to anyone. He did way more with way less than Michael "I was on an entire team of HOF'ers" Irvin. Him refusing to let Michael Irvin slide made for entertaining TV, but squashing the mini-beef was the right play and better for both of them long term. I have more respect for Steve Smith the person now. He'll always be the greatest offensive Panther, but it's nice to see him turning into a happier person off the field as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...