Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We need TD back.


Udogg

Recommended Posts

I don’t know why we don’t just accept the fact that Shaq isn’t a three down LB. He is terrible in coverage and isn’t getting any better by the looks of it. The same guy who thinks he is able to cover guys in the slot is also comfortable with Colin Jones starting at safety. Neither can cover worth a damn and both got picked on heavily today.

If you are going to have him in on 3rd down he needs to be a pass rusher. He’s pretty damn good at it for a 4-3 linebacker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayo is straight trash and sadly Shaw has basically just looked like a more athletic version of Mayo so far this season. There's no reason why TD shouldn't resume his usual role once he's back.

Is their anyway to opt out of that 5th year option we've picked up? Because there's no way he's worth $9M+ next season unless he starts playing a lot better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mayo is straight trash and sadly Shaw has basically just looked like a more athletic version of Mayo so far this season. There's no reason why TD shouldn't resume his usual role once he's back.

Is their anyway to opt out of that 5th year option we've picked up? Because there's no way he's worth $9M+ next season unless he starts playing a lot better. 

Unless he suffers a serious injury, it’s not guaranteed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

Unless he suffers a serious injury, it’s not guaranteed. 

If TD still looks anything like TD when he comes back we just need to honor his wishes to continue playing and let Shaq walk. Not worth $9M+. That type of money is for difference makers.

We drafted a S/LB tweener that covers like a run stopping LB and supports the run like a coverage safety. I've always defended Shaq in the past, but this is his time to shine and it's been hard to remember that he's actually been on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Udogg said:

I'm all for Shaq taking the mantle etc..etc...   But he keeps making the same mistakes over and over.  Mayo .. I can understand.. but this is unacceptable. 

As of right now... we need TD. 

The more games that pass during this period---Shaq's time to shine---I am not all for Shaq taking the mantle. His tackling and discipline is suspect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

The more games that pass during this period---Shaq's time to shine---I am not all for Shaq taking the mantle. His tackling and discipline is suspect. 

Yep, I was all for the torch being passed to Shaq this year. Hell, I said the same thing last off-season for last season. But, Shaq IMO has shown us why that hasn't happened over the past three games. We need to see more out of this guy before we commit $9M+ in cap space to him next season. He's plenty worth his current cap value, but he's certainly not worth $9M+ based on what we've seen out of him so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chaos said:

If we can beat the Giants and get a healthy TD back at 3-1, I’m feeling excited.

Yep, it hasn't always been pretty and I hate losint to a division rival but if you would've told me that we'd have our OL decimated by injury, we'd lose Olsen to injury, Moore would be practically invisible, and our DL would struggle to produce a pass rush and then ask me if I'd take 2-1 going into the bye... I'd say, "Take it?! Are you serious?! I'd LOVE it!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...